Comment Corner

Folks,

Unfortunately, the topic is locked, but we all got to witness once more the batshit insane ramblings of a retard accustomed to yelling at the dishwasher for the evil stalkers to come out and quit leaving water marks on the cups.

Yup, Gangstalking struck again like a bad case of syphilis.

She’s certainly entertaining, but, like always, fails to make her case at all.

What did she intellectually mangle this time? Oh, Jerry, let’s roll the tape.

1. Evidence of something else is evidence of something unrelated happening now.

Gangstalking needs to believe that her social ills are the result of a massive conspiracy perpetrated against her. Since she can’t find evidence of a current conspiracy, she’s fond of digging up wikipedia articles to show how there were past conspiracies or police states. Her pygmy logic is that if something happened 50 years ago in a European communist state, by gum, then she’s being harassed here and now. What’s the logical connection? Well, there isn’t one. It’s akin to believing that the Chinese are currently beaming telepathic satellite beams into her head causing her to believe that Gray’s Anatomy holds cryptic clues regarding her dead mother from the moon because the Americans landed there 40 years ago.

2. Pseudo-science is just as effective as actual science.

Gangstalking believes that if you use a term, you automatically use it correctly. She often refers to “qualitative analysis” to determine if bullshit sensitivity attacks are real or imagined. However, she tosses rigourous methodology right out the window along with her anti-psychotic medication.

There are a lot of problems with simply deciding if too many people are pen-clicking around you. Firstly, you’ve got to establish a base-line of how often people click pens during a random period of the day. If you’re using your memory as a starting place, you’ve already butchered your hopes of finding out for real. The human brain works to filter out background noise; the Party Effect. It’s named for the common occurrence of listening to somebody speak to you at a party while the din of the party is selectively filtered out. Consequently, if you’re just moving and grooving through your day, inconsequential pen-clicks are not going to register in your memory. So, when your brain goes to recall a random period of time and scan it for pen-clicks, it won’t find any encoded.

Next, you have the burden of Positive Reinforcement. People tend to find what they’re looking for and mentally catalogue it. It abolishes the Party Effect.

Also, Gangstalking certainly doesn’t bother with a double-blind approach. She’s the sole arbiter of counting, interpreting and analyzing. What it means is that she contaminates the results she so desperately clings to. Since the things she’s measuring are often times subjective anyway, you’ve got a recipe for statistical disaster that couldn’t be repeated without using her as the observer; a bad, bad sign for reliability of the data.

And she’s not approaching this “study” with an attitude appearing remotely neutral. She’s biased from the get-go. She NEEDS there to be a conspiracy. If there isn’t one, then she’s just a bitchy loser who sticks her self-righteous nose in other people’s business and got ostracised for it. Quite the powerful incentive to skew the results, huh?

If you need good, hard evidence of the information presented in this subsection, right now, feel the chair you're sitting in pressing against your legs and ass. Now ask yourself a simple fucking question. Did I, Dayseed, magically make gravity happen using everyday words across the internet as a sensitizing signal to make you insane OR did you just go looking for a stimulus that was always there but you had been filtering out?

3. The “Conspiracy” is a metaphor for the deficiencies in her sad life.

Ever notice that the reason or motivation for the conspirators is always a compliment to her? Gangstalking is the nuttiest bitch, but in her own head, she’s the star of her own show.

The stalking started because she was a moral person who wanted cable-box billing to end. Rogers simply couldn’t let a such a strong person who wanted to tear down their empire built upon the ill-gotten refunds from errantly billed movies, so they started a massive campaign to ruin her. See? Already, she’s strong, moral, a leader and needs ruining, indirectly restating those first three things again. She’s implying to you, but mostly to herself, that if she hadn’t been ruined by Rogers, she would have rallied the workers like Spartacus, but with more venereal disease.

Also, the vast size of the conspiracy is important too. It means SHE’s important. The government wouldn’t send the army to kill a squirrel, but they’ll devote time, money, resources and manpower to ensuring she’s restricted in society because she’s just that important and that big a threat to them. Believing that she’s that important compensates for the sad reality that she’s just another nobody, amounting to nothing, accomplishing nothing and dying a nothing.

The clues she deduces from rather benign everyday occurrences is actually a compliment too. It means that despite the gargantuan efforts of the conspiracy to remain clandestine, she’s just THAT damn plucky and smart that she was able to spot it DESPITE their efforts. She KNOWS that the clicking of pens is meant to convince her of, shit, I don’t know, but despite posting that she’s cracked the code, the conspirators keep on keeping on with tired, exposed tactics.

4. She’s a hypocrite.

This one is just sad. She despises name calling. She believes that if you name call, it’s a trip through the gutter. But she doesn’t shy away from doing so herself. If you call her a name, you’re a mean immoral bastard; if she does the exact same thing, she’s a brave and tenacious fighter using fire to fight fire. Notice how she compliments herself again?

I’ve noticed that she gets pissed when you even hint that she’s a slut or has a crotch disease, more so than any other generic insult. In her basic world of good and evil, venereal disease is the Scarlett Letter of immoral sexual impropriety. So, if she has a bad case of the clap, it must mean she’s impure somehow and unworthy of the accolades she drips all over herself. The same with homosexuality. It’s against the bible and she believes it to be the hallmark of a wicked sinner, so she isn’t the least bit bashful about throwing gay insults around. She’s a despicable homophobe. What’s worse, for somebody who parades themselves around as a victim, you’d think she’d be sympathetic to a group that has legitimately been victimized rather than intolerant of them. But, that’s the hypocrisy roaring out in her.

Also, her saying that gangstalking is an unspoken holocaust poses no barrier to her slandering others. On this very website, she posted information about who she fingered as the instigator to her stalking, made evil comments about him and left enough detail that you could look up a very real person on a very real website. What’s worse is that she instantly uses all of the same tactics she claimed ruined her life against this person. She vilified him without giving him a chance to defend himself and she wasn’t the least bit hesitant to name him from behind her cloak of anonymity.

What a bitch.

5. She doesn’t get humour.

This one is obvious. Since she’s stunned in the fucking head, she doesn’t understand humour. Her most flaccid attempt at it is to simply ape whatever you’ve written and bastardize it with a “I know you are but what am I?” kindergarten innuendo.

Her best humour comes from her explaining the techniques that the conspiracy uses against her. That shit is seriously funny.

Anyway, that’s just another update on CKA’s resident Batshit Insane cat-piss VD war-hero.