Comment Corner

What you need to know before you know you need it.

 Page 1 of 1
 [ 1 comment ] 

Permanent LinkPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:23 pm 
Well, our dear friend Gangstalking has broken out of the HooHoo Hotel somebody had thoughtfully locked her up in. Now free, she's hell bent on airing out what's wrong with society, conspiracies and, god help us, the odious smells wafting out of her crotch. Does somebody smell sweaty pecans?

What's new in her world since she last blasted off from Earth? Apparently, what's changed is nothing much, but everything all at once. In short, her moral panic has spread.

So, what exactly is a moral panic? A moral panic is a situation where a subversive element has been exposed and has been nefariously working behind the scenes to commit unspeakable acts of evil. More common examples are the Salem witch trials, the Satanic ritual abuse child-care cases in the United States and Canada and most recently, the hidden network of Islamofascist terrorists working in the States. The problem with the last one is that there ARE Islamofascist terrorists looking to blow up chunks of North America because we refuse to staple clothing to women's heads, listen to Chris Cornell (Carry On fucking rokz by the way, he get's out some screams that will melt your face inside out.) and aren't publically castrated for saying that Jesus Christ would be a great unlockable character in Metal Gear Solid 4 or Mario Kart Wii. The distinguishing feature between the "Shit, we should probably look into this guys" of monitoring homegrown terrorists and "Fuck me, my taxes are going towards this?" chasing naturalized Arabs who love these countries is what typically personifies villains in moral panics.

That, reader beware, is a damned if you do, damned if you don't attitude. The villains in a moral panic are presumed guilty, can't win and evidence of their innocence is actually fantastic evidence of the power of their conspiracy.

With the Satanic ritual abuse cases, in most instances, a single child's comment triggered a nightmare of misunderstanding, not unlike a child commenting that Rosie O'Donell seemed funny. In those cases, the comment was inferred by panic-stricken parents to mean some sort of sexual abuse. The sexual abuse was horribly investigated by self-appointed experts, who used the most insidiously leading questions, verbal abuse and shit-poor theories to lure confessions from children. The salient part which relates here is that whoever was named by the children during their marathon brow-beatings was damned from the start. If a child didn't disclose abuse, then the child was just too afraid or embarassed to admit that it happened. If they did disclose, obviously they were telling the truth as what child could possibly invent the twisted scenarios they were describing?

The "villain" couldn't win. Children who didn't point the finger at him/her were hiding the abuse, children who did were obviously disclosing.

And that's the main problem in Gangstalkingworld. None of the people (named by name thanks to the cowardly bitch who whips out other's real names while hiding behind a hypocritical cloak of anonymity) in her bizarre theories can ever escape the label of conspirator that she so freely applies to them. In her world, if she confronts somebody with her "evidence" and they deny it, they're merely trying to hide being caught. She's never had anybody confess (since the whole thing is in her batty little pinhead) so she doesn't have any examples.

Consequently, her conspiracy grows to enormous, all-encompassing proportions. She routinely uses terms like society, people and "those in charge" to define the people who she believes have ruined her chances at being a moral leader. What she doesn't understand is that she's sitting waistdeep in an anti-jurisprudent sewer and adding to it. If nobody can be "proven" innocent (which goes against one of our fundamental principles of justice), everybody's in on it. If everybody's in on it, everybody's guilty (which goes against the second principle of justice, it's more desirable to set a guilty man free than jail an innocent man).

Since everybody's guilty, she can't test out her "Cointelpro" theories. She can never check to see if she's right, since nobody can "pass" the test and not be considered part of the conspiracy. Couple that with Baroness Von Stupidschiezen's internet-produced evidence which is so poorly defined it includes everybody anyway and you've got on your hands a moral panic just lacking in popular attention.

Much like there were no witches in Salem, no ritual Satanic abuses, no occult recruitment in Dungeons and Dragons and no more DHARMA Initiative on the Island, Gangstalking isn't the victim of a vast conspiracy determined to drive her insane by key-jingling, horn-honking and vibrating floors.

Quite frankly, she's already flipped ass over teakettle into insanity and doesn't need any of our help.

SPOILER ALERT:

Why didn't that crybaby fat-fuck even get nominated on Hell's Kitchen 3 last night? Ramsey should just cut the fucker down at the knees and use his fat ass for a serving table. A sweaty crying fainting table.

_________________
Nam eloquentiam quae admirationem non habet nullam iudico


 Profile  
 


Comments
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Online
Profile
Permanent LinkPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:30 pm 

how long have you bee stalking this person?





 Page 1 of 1
 [ 1 comment ] 


 

Author
USER_AVATAR

Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (177)

Archives
- September 2008
ODE TO DUMMY MATT
   Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:12 pm

+ July 2008
+ May 2008
+ April 2008
+ March 2008
+ February 2008
+ January 2008
+ December 2007
+ November 2007
+ October 2007
+ September 2007
+ August 2007
+ July 2007
+ June 2007
+ May 2007
+ April 2007
+ March 2007
+ February 2007
+ January 2007
+ December 2006
+ November 2006
+ October 2006
+ September 2006
+ August 2006
+ July 2006
+ June 2006