Hello Darkness! The Official Blog of Helen Keller

Fanaholics, there's another "blog" on here which is currently owned, operated and maintained by a paranoid delusional. I put this particular piece out to you as a healthy public service message about the dangers of believing your own press.

Over on Gangstalking World (audience: me. Well, now it's nobody, I was banned. Give the exchange a read, it's hilarious!), gangstalking once again reared her ugly head in all of its hypocritical, malinformed and now, bluntly, dangerous glory.

Gangstalking is well convinced she is the target of a massive, multinational conspiracy designed to, well, she isn't sure, but the powers-that-be consider her to be a worthy target. What originally happened, according to the various echo-chamber websites she devotes her life to having nobody read, was that she insisted upon being an officious person in her workplace. Do you know the person at your job that gets offended by everything, files complaint after complaint, makes everybody watch their step, yet these people truly have such a massive social retardation they wonder why people don't like them? That's gangstalking. She was the workplace rabid dog. Nobody could ever really tell what was going to set her off and get them bit. Don't take my word for it though, feel free to read her readily advertised websites.

Rather than dig deep within herself and accurately assess the social problems she was having, she instead found a theory on the internet which took blame away from herself and placed it on a faceless entity; a gang-stalking conspiracy. After a quick self-diagnosis based on shaky internet theory written by other laypersons, she was relieved to know that it wasn't her that was to blame, it was everybody else on the planet. Even better, this new theory allowed her to explain the conspiracy's motivations in very flattering terms! They were jealous of her morals, her leadership, her vision and that she was destined to be President of Earth Council once the planet recognized her for who she is.

It certainly couldn't have been people in her office scared the rabid dog would bite again.

However, it's very difficult to convince others that far-reaching, complex conspiracies exist with the sole purpose of, well, doing something nasty to her. It's hard to explain HOW the conspiracy could exist, work and leave itself forevermore unexposed. So, like any good conspiracy theorist, she invented wacky scenarios, unsupported by reality, which sounded good to her. It was much more fun coming up with the complimentary motivations of the conspiracy! The crazier her theories became, the crazier people thought her.

Since real people have long since necessarily become part of this vast conspiracy, she's found solace and companionship on the internet comprised of, guess who, other victims of THEIR OWN conspiracies! Victims of Masons, blacks, the CIA and the Illuminati are all having keys jingled in their own private little worlds and gangstalking found them. Operating on the principle of "I'll blindly support you if you blindly support me", gangstalking found fit to post a fellow nutter's own tale of perceived woe on her site.

Long story short, this person felt that her crazy black Masonic neighbours were leaving poison out for her dogs to step in (it must be a hell of a "poison" to sit for hours on a lawn and be absorbed through the rough pad of a dog's paw) among other things. According to gangstalking, this lady found fit to shout to her SO (I presume it meant significant other) that it would be easy to toss liverwurst in THEIR yard and let them wonder if it were poisoned.

In Canada, that's uttering a threat and it's a crime. Check out Section 264.1 of the Criminal Code. Since gangstalking felt (and still feels, read her response to me below) I questioned her on the morality of supporting somebody who would poison animals based on what could very well be a paranoid delusion. After the completely absurd angle of stating that perhaps the lady intended for the black Masons to eat unquestioningly meat they found on the ground, she wrote:



This is where she's dangerous. In the Supreme Court's decision in R v. Clemente, the test is one of what a reasonable person would perceive as being a threat given the full circumstances of how the threat was conveyed and what the threat was. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld that words constitute a threat if a reasonable person could tell the intent of them was to intimidate. Gangstalking above is rationalizing her support of a criminal offence. And make no mistake about it, shouting in your neighbourhood that it would be easy to poison meat and throw it in somebody's yard is a threat. According to this same case-law, there is no requirement for the intended victim to even be aware of the threat.

That is, even though this lady shouted it for her neighbours to hear, gangstalking thinks that since she was speaking to her spouse, the issue of a threat is null and void. It isn't. What happened was a crime and gangstalking supported it.

Supporting criminal actions (let alone the outright poisoning of dogs) is a serious breach of any ethical commitments she may hint she has.

Gangstalking was always a paranoid delusional. Now she's progressed to being a pathological delusional who believes that real retaliation to perceived, unproven threat is both appropriate and necessary.

This is dangerous conduct. My advice? Steer far and clear of this one. That's certainly what I'm doing.