Page 1 of 1
 [ 3 replies ] 

Permanent LinkPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:09 pm 
Appeal to False Authority

Here’s another (well…it’s building on already posted ideas) – what to do with the poster that feels there personal information is sacrosanct, but wields it about when the feel it suits their crumbling argument?

For instance – someone always invokes his or her vocation as a de facto legitimacy tool for whatever argument they see fit. So and so is a fireman, and because the 9/11 attacks involved stated profession and fire, they are now, by extension, experts on all things firefighting, building demolition, chemical reactions, missile strikes, airplane mechanics, piloting airliners, global politics and conspiracy theorists. Not only is that a huge miscarriage of logic, but also they often wear it as a badge of honour and dare others to question it.

The inevitable bitching and whining often follows this when that same freely volunteered information is questioned (or used in satirical fun) as relevant or even truthful. Here’s a quick truism – don’t volunteer information on forums or use it in a manner that suggest an appeal to false authority unless you wasn’t it vigorously questioned, challenged or addressed. You volunteered it. You believed served a purpose when you claimed your DeVry diploma qualified you as expert on Renaissance philosophy, so know you forfeit your alleged cry-baby rights to complain when someone asks how a DeVry piece of paper allows you to question Durer’s existence. Don’t like it. Don’t post it. And don’t complain that this somehow violates some vague forum rules if it’s used against you, but it’s somehow above reproach when its levelled against others. It’s a chickenshit way out and it signals your disingenuous nature.

Oh well…another day, another forum musing. Remember forum fans, keep posting, keep smiling and keep checking out the Comment Corner. Like milk, it does a body good. :wink:

_________________
"Wannsee was just a conference of top administrators." (BeaverFeaver trying to downplay the origins of the Final Solution)


 Profile  
 


Comments
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Permanent LinkPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:20 pm 

It baffles me that people can call 'foul' when an astronomer claims a collapse resembles a demolition, and then turn around and claim, in their 'professional' opinion (as an electrician/geologist/pilot/hairdresser), that it didn't look like a demolition - apparently reading one's own posts is too much of a hassle for some.

Alas, this is a point I tried to address several times in the forum as of late - interestingly enough, the foolish claims of authority ceased soon afterwards.

I'd point out in detail the "So have you ever been in combat?" argument that's flung around this forum so freely, but I'd be accused of dishonouring our troops and veterans... there's two fallacies for the price of one!

_________________
Image


Permanent LinkPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:57 am 

The “Appeal to Authority” must be amongst the most insidious of BS ploys on message boards. The alarms should ring if someone’s argument (usually the result of web surfin’ researchin’) is summed up by “so-and-so say so”.

Worse still, however, is the sap who tries to use message boards to persuade others that he himself is an authority. For instance, anyone who tries to present himself as a) an academic, b) a research scientist and c) an educator should be certain that one’s lot in life is not – in fact – d) none of the above.

8)

_________________
When the pH of the soil becomes acidic the Al becomes toxic to the roots of the plant and yields plummet. - "Dr" Bobby


Permanent LinkPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:59 am 

WIAF and Mustang1,

I'll do you one better with the aim of the Appeal to False Authority. I've found that it is usually Silencing by Perceived Authority. That is, once the "boom" is lowered, there is this accompanying sense of finality to the discussion and the poster of the "boom" assumes he can walk away.

The shit hits the fan when somebody else questions either a) their message or b) the messenger's credentials. Suddenly, this is when the Appeal to False Authority poster has an ape-shit rang-fest and the fun begins.

_________________
Nam eloquentiam quae admirationem non habet nullam iudico





 Page 1 of 1
 [ 3 replies ] 


 

Author
USER_AVATAR

Location: Ontario
Blog: View Blog (5)

Archives
- March 2008
BATSH*T WATCH. UPDATE!
   Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:32 pm

+ August 2006
+ June 2006