Page 3 of 57
 [ 284 blog entries ]  Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 57  Next

Permanent LinkPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:19 pm 
The case against me and what I understand of it.


The gangstalking file.


http://www.workplacebullying.org/2009/05/14/uk-green2/

Quote:
The largest part of the award is the £640,000 awarded for future loss of earnings and a pension, and it is this portion which marks the case out as unusual.

“We have seen cases like this before a number of times but the court has awarded such a large amount because it took the view that this person would not be able to work at this salary level for a long time in the future,” said Tom Potbury, a lawyer specialising in employment law at Pinsent Masons.

Green, 36, had said she was subjected to “offensive, abusive, intimidating, denigrating, bullying, humiliating, patronizing, infantile and insulting words and behavior” and subjected to crude and lewd comments from her former colleagues. Her colleagues would move her papers, hide her post and remove her from document circulation lists. She alleged that some of the colleagues had ignored and excluded her, that her personal and professional authority was undermined, and her workload increased to unreasonable and arbitrary levels.

Her lawyer said medical experts on both sides of the case agreed that Green developed a major depressive disorder, but there was disagreement about its cause.

Deutsche Bank said it had not breached its duties to Green and denied that she was bullied, saying she had had a predisposition to mental illness. Deutsche Bank paid for stress counselling and assertiveness training for Green but she had a nervous breakdown before returning to work and suffering a relapse.



I have read the above case scenario several times. It's funny because the workplace mobbing that I encountered was very similar in some regards to some of the things that went on in this case. Instead of being on the winning end of a lawsuit, I am on this end of an in...

[ Continued ]


 Viewed 1533 times
Permanent LinkPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:26 am 
Domestic terrorists. They are amongst us.


What does this term really mean?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_t ... ted_States


"the unlawful use of force or violence, committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."[2]


So unlawful use of force or violence. By one more more individuals, against a person, their property to intimidate, or coerce, a civilian population or any segment, to further political or social objectives.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have domestic terrorist amongst us. They are in use everyday in many democratic countries.



Ruth Goodman

Quote:
I am a philosopher/writer who was posting my writings on the Internet for a period of about 5 years, ignoring the online harassment I often received.

I was also contacted at home, in my personal life by a couple of men who work for the government... Brian Kohler, with the D.O.D. (I know this is his real name, I have been to his and his parents home in Fairfax Virginia. His father, Larry Kohler, works for the Pentagon) pretended at first to be in love with me, this was 5 years ago when I was more naive. He flew out to California several times pretending he was going to relocate to move in with me. It turned out that he was lying, and was actually stalking me for counter intelligence. His intimidation kept me from writing on the internet for about a year, but then I went back to doing it, refusing to give in to terrorists.



About a year and a half ago I was contacted by another man, Jason Duncan (not sure if this is his real name) made similar contact with me pretending to be a friend interested in discussing spiritual principles. While at my apartment he staked out the neighborhood, and a couple...


[ Continued ]


 Viewed 1687 times
Permanent LinkPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 7:40 am 
A few weeks ago, I provided a post that looked like this.


Quote:


"In the democracy, they came first for the Extremists, but I did not say anything because I was not an extremist.

Then they came for the conspiracy theorists and the denialists, but I did not say anything because I was not a conspiracy theorist or a denialist.

Then they came for a the Targeted Individuals, but again I did not say anything because I was not a Targeted Individual.

Then they came for the outspoken and the some of the Christians, but I did not say anything then either, because I was not outspoken or a Christian.

Then they came for me, and by this time there was no one left to speak. "



I think that this is a real breakdown of what we will see if history should start to repeat itself. Based on that, I have been spending a lot of time getting to know, via observation a specific group on the net, that is considered to be extreme, and who might be at the epicenter of such an event if they did go after extremists first.

I have been learning what they believe, why they think and feel the way they do, and looking for signs that their communities are going to be following the script above, in getting targeted first, just like the communists were first targeted in Germany.



Would they really come for the extremists first?

Well like many others I have been paying attention to news articles. What I would expect to see is an increase in extremist killings, kind of like how we had those mysterious killing sprees that were suppose to get us all so scared, guns would be banned. Anyways, what I have been on the alert for is an increase in this type of media hype in regards to extremists a) and b) and increase in demonizing the community.

Remember in Germany it was the communists that they came for first. That group was easy to pick on and they were the first to be attacked. Once this was left to happen, it was easy to go after other political enemies,...

[ Continued ]


 Viewed 1598 times
Permanent LinkPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:48 am 
Turn off the set and get on the net.


As you know I have spent a great deal of time researching different communities on the internet. The opportunity is there, so why not utilize it.

One thing I have discovered is that a lot of people in some of the communities that I visit watch little televiion, or no televiion at all. They get more or most of their entertaiment and news from the internet. I hear this expression a lot. "I hardly watch television", or "I don't watch television at all.

I find that a lot of people who have stopped or decreased using the mainstream media to be well versed, more so than those who use the mainstream media, and who watch large amounts of television.

I also find that those who have given up the TV set, all the music stations, and reality tv, have a better sense of some of what's happening in the world. I don't just mean the screen that's been put over our eyes, but what's behind the screen, what's really going on.

I find a lot of these people are at least if not believers, they are aware of some of the conspiracies out there, and they are a bit more willing to be open minded, or at least willing to be looking for the truth.

Don't get me wrong, you have others who replace the tv for social networking sites, and I am not sure they are getting the same positive effects, but your chances are greater online that you will be exposed to a variety of different concepts, dissenting views, and theories than you would be by watching television.

Don't get me wrong, I watched television and still catch a few shows, but very little time is spent being feed the commercials and culture that the mainstream want most people to adapt.

I think surfing intelligently gives more room for critical thought and critical thinking. I believe this to be true for the young as well as the old.

I came across one real life scenario where a family had a young child. At the time I thought he should have been put into a pre-school program, because...

[ Continued ]


 Viewed 1576 times
Permanent LinkPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:49 am 
This post was really just going to be a short blurb, but the more I researched, the more their was to the story and I thought if I was going to tell the story, then I had better do it right, so where do I begin?

Well originally I thought the story was going to be about Keith de Roux and the fact that he killed Wolfgang Droege, but more importantly, I believe very strongly that Keith de Roux, might have been a Targeted Individual. That's where my investigation of this story started, but not where it ended, so I will take you through it bit by bit.

As usual, I came across a story that lead to another story, that lead to a death and a killer, but what caught my eye about the killer was his reasons for doing the killings. Stop me if you have heard this one before.

Quote:
Friday said the 44-year-old Deroux's cocaine addiction was fuelling ‘paranoid delusions’ that listening devices and cameras had been placed in his apartment. The drug addict believed someone was sending him coded messages through his computer and, even after moving to a new residence, Deroux feared people were entering his house through an underground tunnel and funnelling "noxious gases" into the residence. The only person with enough resources for this kind of surveillance, Deroux figured, was his friend and cocaine dealer, Wolfgang Droege. …


Ofcourse the killer is written off as some drug addicted paranoid whack job, who was just imagining, or making the whole thing up due to his paranoia, but let's look at the details. He believe he was under surveillance, listening devices, cameras, placed in his apartment. He believed that he was getting coded messages via his computer, and wait for it, even after moving the same things continued to happen. This time he moved to a house, he experiences gassing and home breakin's or home entry. The only part that is not clear is why he believe that they were using a tunnel of some sort to get in. Could be the drugs, or maybe...

[ Continued ]


Last edited by gangstalking on Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.


 Viewed 1711 times
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  



 Page 3 of 57
 [ 284 blog entries ]  Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 57  Next


 

Author

Blog: View Blog (284)

Archives
- July 2009
MJ makes sainthood
   Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:48 pm
Psi Ops
   Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:02 pm
A baiting we will go.
   Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:52 pm
Are informants stupid?
   Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:38 pm

+ June 2009
+ May 2009
+ April 2009
+ March 2009
+ February 2009
+ January 2009
+ December 2008
+ November 2008
+ October 2008
+ September 2008
+ August 2008
+ July 2008
+ June 2008
+ May 2008
+ April 2008
+ March 2008
+ February 2008
+ December 2007
+ November 2007
+ October 2007
+ September 2007
+ August 2007
+ July 2007
+ June 2007
+ May 2007
+ February 2007
+ January 2007
+ December 2006
+ November 2006
+ October 2006