Page 1 of 1
 [ 1 comment ] 

Permanent LinkPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:02 pm 
As mentioned before the police sometime use psychics in their investigations.

www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/eu ... 866075.ece

Quote:

“Some of the information is about precise location or co-ordinates and that allows us to go to the place and we will check it,” he said. “Just a few days ago we got one address near Lagos [about five miles from Praia da Luz] but it didn't amount to anything.”

Mr Sousa said he did not believe they had heard from Madeleine's abductor: “If it was a message from the kidnapper, it will offer enough clues to help us to go to the right place.”

He said it was not unusual to investigate the claims of clairvoyants but added it was only one line of investigation.

“In this case the amount of information we have received is huge," he said. “Any information that comes to us, if there is enough to follow, we will check.”

It is not known if a “vision” was the source of the information which led to Portuguese detectives asking British police to raid a London home where they believed Madeleine might have been kept.





I have also mentioned that they have used remote viewers when looking for hostages, and other events.

http://www.remoteviewinglight.com/html/ ... sense.html



Quote:

Book Description of "The Seventh Sense: The Secrets of Remote Viewing as Told by a Psychic Spy for the U.S. Military", by Lyn Buchanan:
For the past thirty years, the United States government has secretly trained a select corps of military personnel in the art of "remote viewing" -- the psychic ability to perceive the thoughts and experiences of others through the power of the human mind...

Now, for the first time, Lyn Buchanan -- a world-renowned expert on remote viewing and its potential -- tells the complete, candid story of his experiences. Assigned for nearly a decade to a clandestine U.S. Army intelligence group, Buchanan trained military personnel who utilized their inherent psychic abilities as a data-collection tool during the Iran hostage crisis, the Chernobyl disaster, and the Gulf War.

In this incredible account, Buchanan tells how he was selected for his unique psychic abilities, and how he was transformed from an ordinary soldier into one of our nation's leading psychic spies. Working on top-secret government and military projects using "mental espionage" created permanent, life-altering changes within Buchanan. Now, after many years of analysis and interpretation, he reveals the techniques and mental exercises used to train remote viewers, and demonstrates that each of us carries a dormant psychic ability that we can explore and use ourselves.

For anyone interested in a hard, scientific look at the reality of psychic covert operations in the world today, or anyone who has ever wondered if he or she could have the inherent skills to become a remote viewer, this fascinating chronicle of life as a psychic spy will reveal the answers.




There is a lot going on that people are not aware of, or just refuse to accept. I think that's the idea however. I was the same way, but after doing some research, well I am a believer.

http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2 ... g-tech-way


Quote:
Mind-Reading Tech May Not Be Far Off
At the World Science Festival this week, indications that brain scanners may soon uncover your private thoughts
By Brooke Borel Posted 06.12.2009 at 5:15 pm

Neuroscientists are already able to read some basic thoughts, like whether an individual test subject is looking at a picture of a cat or an image with a specific left or right orientation. They can even read pictures that you're simply imagining in your mind's eye. Even leaders in the field are shocked by how far we've come in our ability to peer into people's minds. Will brain scans of the future be able to tell if a person is lying or telling the truth? Suggest whether a consumer wants to buy a car? Reveal our secret likes and dislikes, or our hidden prejudices? While we aren't there yet, these possibilities have dramatic social, legal and ethical implications.



These are artificial means of looking into the mind. What I have been researching are people who would have more natual abilities to reach into the mind and read the private thoughts of others. The ultimate way to violate someone, going into their minds and sharing their private dreams, thoughts, hopes, desires with others. The Tom Cruise movie minority report is in many ways not far off.

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/short ... ing-p.html


Quote:

September 23, 2008 1:28 PM
'Pre-crime' detector shows promise
FASTLast year, New Scientist revealed that the US Department of Homeland Security is developing a system designed to detect "hostile thoughts" in people walking through border posts, airports and public places. The DHS says recent tests prove it works.

Project Hostile Intent as it was called aimed to help security staff choose who to pull over for a gently probing interview - or more.

ommentators slated the idea that sensors could spot people up to no good from their pulse rate, breathing, skin temperature, or fleeting facial expressions. One likened it to the "pre-crime" units that predict criminal behaviour in the movie Minority Report.

FAST1.jpgHowever, last week, the DHS science unit gave an update on the project, now dubbed the less-hostile-sounding Future Attribute Screening Technologies (FAST) programme. And, if DHS claims are to be believed, the research appears to be getting somewhere




What I am also saying is that they are now actively using also using readers. Mind readers in the course of their investigations.

What to look for. People who might not have fit in childhood. People who are emotional spazes, not overtly, but may be prone to outbursts. Many might seem nice or friendly on the onside, but might be emotional, and mental manipulators. They are feeders. Mind reading isn't just about reading people's thoughts, it's violating them and feeding that information back to others.

It's a psychic violation, but it's also a bit of a feed. The way some people feed off the energy of others, the readers feed in a similar manner on the thoughts of others. It makes them in many cases feel superior, a secret that others don't know about, or a secret to be used to win friends, and impress others.

In a psi/psy op, these are some of the roles you might expect to find. They may not always be present, but this is a likely senario. These roles have been observed outside of the workplace and in the targets community as well.


Roles

Conductor- (One who coordinates the actions and the players in the environment. Also known as the controller.)

Observers- (People who observe what is happening and report back.

Mind Readers-(When external observations just are not good enough. These will be used to read and report back the targets thoughts and reactions)

Security-(Someone with a security background, anywhere from Judo lessons, to security, etc.)

The persons who will deliver the harassment or sorry the stimuli in the targets environment, whatever that might be. This might be other co-workers, or players specifically hired for the role.

To help you better understand this I will give you a few scenarios.


Scenario one.


Ash has been directed to play the role of conductor.

The stimuli will be delivered by Razon.

The reader will be Ivanna.

Observer will be Khalisha

The circus performers will likely be a part of the targeted individuals training class if there is a training class in session. The reader will try to make friends with the target, because a link has to be established. The conductor get's the participants into their roles.

If it's a situation where there are names on the desk, they manipulate the seating arrangements to suit the situation.


In the above scenario, you would have Razon and others deliver a stimuli, the target would be observed by Khalisha and others, and the conductor ash would tell everyone what to do. The reader Ivanna would have a link to the target, and observer how the target response to the stimulus. So a variety of skits will be run throughout the day, trying to keep the target engaged. While the observers, and the reader watch, record, how the target responds to each stimuli.


The experiment will continue as long as the subject is in the environment. The idea is to find what's working, and ofcourse to try to eliminate the target, by any means necessary from the workplace environment. Again the main players will if possible try to gain access to the target, and befriend the target, depending on the assigned roles.

They will also see and observe if the target has any hostility towards the participant who is delivering the stimuli.

The target is not to realise that such a game is being played, and thus the target is aware of what is happening, but not the roles being carried out, the observations being made, and recorded. Ofcourse much like the couple that was vindicated by having their neighbour who harassed them by singing the Addams family song daily, a target will also be very aware, even hyper aware if there are skits being run, or if they are being exposed to a stimuli, which they have been negatively sensitised to.

The players around may not be aware of this, but they carry out their assigned roles.



Scenario 2


Shylo might be hired for security due to his judo expertise.

Kevi might be hired for her "special abilities".

Depending on the environments, players and roles might be added later on. Eg. If it's a workplace that is doing a lot of hiring, then the players might be hired at once. If it's not a work environment that is doing a lot of hiring, the additional players might have to be hired after.

Again the players would be hired to observe, befriend, find out information on, and watch and listen what happens in the environment. Readers appear to be harmless on the outside, giving off an air of friendliness, but the environments that create such natural abilities, in many cases will show people who were always just on the outside, who needed to develop the special skill to find out what people were thinking to fit in better. It's a manipulative, and deceitful role if it is being done for nefarious purposes. It's also a parasitic and feeding role. Host and parasite. The host often unaware that their very private thoughts, wishes, hopes, dreams are being violated in such a manner.

Again the reader depending on the range, will be in a sitting position as close to the target as needed. Security will also be nearby, should the target flip out. We know how wrong these little psi/psy ops can go. Just like with the first scenario, if a participant has not been hired to deliver the stimuli, then participants in the environment will be told and directed what to do, and will be asked to observer the reaction of the subject.

The reader will be doing the same, but on a very different level. The drama, I mean psi/psy ops begins. It will again keep going with different dramas and skits being introduced into the environment, until the target wigs out, or a reason is found to get rid of the target. If no reason is found, more might be introduced into the environment. The idea is to get the target upset, to quit, to get fired, to have a bad reaction, something to frame the target, to get rid of the target, even if that is not what the players have been overtly told they are doing that is the goal.


Scenario three.


Alexia-The conductor
Sam- Will delver the stimuli
Ronette- Will be security
You have the observers
Fawn- will be the reader

The target will again be placed strategically around the players with the conductor being in a position to direct the person delivering the stimuli. Plus able to co-ordinate the other. The observers will be placed close enough to observe what is happening.


Once again the co-workers will be directed to carry out skits, the players will observe the reaction of the target. The reader depending on range will be asked to be near the target. Security in a similar strategic position. The person who is to deliver the stimuli is usually directly behind the target, across from, or directly in front of the target situation and seating allowed.

Again the target is not to be aware that this is the scenario, or that these skits are deliberately being carried out. The co-workers are told what to do, again often not realising that they are pawns in a pretty unkind psi/psy op. They carry out a stimuli, and then observe the target reaction.

Some workplace environments will foster false reports more than others, these people in many cases will feed the hysteria that is not there, and see things that re not there, based on what they have been told, and is that not just human nature? Remember they are independent agents and they report what they see fit.


I recently reported a story about a guy who back in school we had been told was a pervert in one of my classes when I was back in school. Because of what we had been told, people were always seeing things that were not really there, comments would be taken out of context, and many of the girls thereafter were uncomfortable around him, because of what I now believe was a blatant lie. His life was made hell because of it, but no one believed they were doing anything wrong at the time. He was made out to be an unclean person, and other things, again always the same sources feeding the hate, but we never as a group saw it that way. Now years later on the other side of the fence, I get what was being done, and the behind the scenes that were being manipulated.

So targets it's again very possible that these hateful co-workers, neighbours, etc, are also being manipulated in a similar manner, and because HR or managers, and others in authority are directing them about what to do, say, act, ect, they will go along with it in many cases without question.

So anyways in scenario three, the same actions would be carried out. The target will be strategically placed near the reader, they will be placed in front of, behind, or beside, the person to carry out the stimuli, security will be nearby, and the observers will be all over, ready and waiting for the testimonies to begin. Because such an environment is more then likely to create paranoia amongst people that might not be that bright to begin with, and the games (psi/psy op) are allowed to continue consistently, the fishing expedition is often likely to eventually find something to go fishing with, be it real or imagined.

One thing you can do, is if you are aware of these skits in your life, you might try to find ways of cluing in others, or better yet, see if you or someone around you can take note of what is happening. The more aware people are of what is happening, the better chance they stand of fighting it.

Just being aware that these people are being used might help gain an advantage for many in similar situations.


 Profile  
 


Comments
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Permanent LinkPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:18 am 

Are you still locked in your basement being terrorized by hungry squirrels?

_________________
liberals aren't interested in your opinion, or even your sincere support, but only that you understand that there's one single, acceptable answer. We don't teach kids to memorize historic dates or great poetry anymore, but we do insist they memorize correct attitudes and regurgitate them correctly when required to do so in public.
Much of the progressive agenda – on marriage, immigration, and much else – involves not winning the argument but ruling any debate out of bounds. Mark Steyn





 Page 1 of 1
 [ 1 comment ] 


 

Author

Blog: View Blog (284)

Archives
- July 2009
MJ makes sainthood
   Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:48 pm
Psi Ops
   Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:02 pm
A baiting we will go.
   Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:52 pm
Are informants stupid?
   Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:38 pm

+ June 2009
+ May 2009
+ April 2009
+ March 2009
+ February 2009
+ January 2009
+ December 2008
+ November 2008
+ October 2008
+ September 2008
+ August 2008
+ July 2008
+ June 2008
+ May 2008
+ April 2008
+ March 2008
+ February 2008
+ December 2007
+ November 2007
+ October 2007
+ September 2007
+ August 2007
+ July 2007
+ June 2007
+ May 2007
+ February 2007
+ January 2007
+ December 2006
+ November 2006
+ October 2006