BartSimpson wrote:
Yogi wrote:
It's much more than 'just a story' Bart. And yes, the Mounties were
obligated by Canadian law to be there as they had every reason to believe that there was in fact an
illegal 45 cal handgun in the residence.
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/CanadaAM/2012 ... ot-120208/Mohandas Gandhi wrote:
An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so.
As I understand your laws a legally owned handgun can become an illegally owned handgun just because the RCMP says it is. No court oversight is required.
That said, it would be of no surprise to me if Mr. Robison's first inkling that he had an 'illegal. handgun was when the RCMP entered his home demanding that he turn it over.
Arbitrarily making criminals out of people whose neighbors don't see them as a problem is an act of tyranny in the classical sense. Thus the Gandhi quote.
There was witnesses who were present at the time of the death threats were made. With their (sworn) statements to police, the RCMP were obligated to follow up. Now, the Rc's or any police agency for that matter,
cannot arbitrarily take it upon themselves just to enter into a dwelling and do a search and seizure. They would have had to take their evidence to the Crown Prosecutor, have him review it,
and then issue a search warrant. For whatever reason, the RCMP were'nt in any particular hurry as the Crown wasn't approached until Monday. The warrant was issued and acted upon on Tuesday.
So it's not like the cops got wind of a rumor and went all gung-ho kickin in doors just for the hell of it!
If someone came to your home, or even telephoned you and made death threats to you/your family, ( Let's just suppose for this conversation that you didn't 'take the threat out' with one of your howitzers. ) would you not expect the local LEO's to take your complaint seriously, and follow up?