CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1316
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 4:35 pm
 


In 2012, it seemed as though Alberta’s long-running Progressive Conservative dynasty was finished. The Wildrose Alliance party, led by Danielle Smith, was set to form government.

Hence it was all the more shocking that the Wildrose lost the election.

In the aftermath of the election, Danielle Smith said that her party needed to do some “soul-searching” in regards to policies that were rejected by Albertans. Over the next two years, the Wildrose would begin moderating its political positions. It came out in support of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and denouncing intolerance against gays, even as it dumped other ideas such as having Alberta collect its own taxes, form its own pension plan and police force and giving “conscience rights” to allow health care professionals to not perform abortions if they don’t want to.

This was broadly seen as a move by the Wildrose towards the political centre, especially after the statements made by former candidate Alan Hunsperger about gays being condemned to burn in a “lake of fire” are widely seen to be one of the main reasons why the Wildrose lost in 2012. What’s less commonly known is that the Wildrose Alliance has long had elements in its platform that are not what one would typically expect from a conservative party.

As far back as 2010, the Wildrose Alliance had said that it would respect the federal Canada Health Act in delivering health care, which has been criticized by conservatives who would prefer to see health care left entirely up to the provinces. It also talked about reducing price spikes in the energy market and supported providing incentives for the oil and gas industry to refine more of Alberta’s bitumen here at home. These policies don’t exactly mesh with the conservative mantra of governments not interfering in the marketplace.

Even though these policies are not typically associated with conservatism, they did not prevent the Wildrose from sweeping southern Alberta in 2012. Nor is it likely that moving towards the centre on social and environmental issues will hurt the party in the next election either. Even if you only believe that the Wildrose is making these changes to get elected, and are disguising their true agenda, the fact that the Wildrose thinks that doing this will help them win the next election speaks volumes.

This is nothing new in Alberta. Ralph Klein is widely remembered for cutting government spending and eliminating the deficit and debt, but once the books were balanced he started putting money back into the system. Similarly, when the Supreme Court ordered Alberta to include gay rights in its human rights code in the Vriend case, Klein refused to use the Charter of Rights’ notwithstanding clause to overturn the ruling, despite demands from other conservatives to do so. None of this prevented him from getting re-elected four times.

Moving to the political centre is often a key to success in Canada. In this, Alberta is no different from the rest of the country.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 45143
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 6:06 am
 


Now that Jim Prentice has mirrored a few of those values on Healthcare and no sales tax, I wonder if he can revive the cardiac patient that is the Alberta PCs.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Edmonton Oilers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6932
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 7:00 am
 


I get the feeling that the WR's suggestion that one of Prentice's people phoned Smith, wanting to merge the 2 parties back fired on her.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 22707
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:25 am
 


The Wildrose is now considered centrist? 8O Really?

While I admit they have promised to change their ways, they haven't, certainly not on social issues. Otherwise they would have supported Bill 503. Instead EVERY single Wildrose MLA present voted against it (9 out of 17;

http://globalnews.ca/news/1258107/alber ... ance-bill/

And their 10/10 plan would re-introduce austerity back into Alberta, pushing infrastructure investments farther and farther into the future, simply because they are unwilling to consider changing the royalty regime, raising taxes or re-instating healthcare fees.

Sorry, but the Wildrose is anything but centrist based on their current platform/voting history. They may not be as far right as they used to be, but they still sit the farthest right when compared with the other Alberta parties.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1316
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 3:53 pm
 


bootlegga bootlegga:
The Wildrose is now considered centrist? 8O Really?

While I admit they have promised to change their ways, they haven't, certainly not on social issues. Otherwise they would have supported Bill 503. Instead EVERY single Wildrose MLA present voted against it (9 out of 17;

http://globalnews.ca/news/1258107/alber ... ance-bill/

And their 10/10 plan would re-introduce austerity back into Alberta, pushing infrastructure investments farther and farther into the future, simply because they are unwilling to consider changing the royalty regime, raising taxes or re-instating healthcare fees.

Sorry, but the Wildrose is anything but centrist based on their current platform/voting history. They may not be as far right as they used to be, but they still sit the farthest right when compared with the other Alberta parties.


As I said in the article, even if the Wildrose is trying to hide their policy agenda it says a lot about what they believe Albertans will go for. Even if the Wildrose is not as centrist as it seems, Albertans as a whole certainly are, much more so than either many of our critics or many of our admirers in other parts of Canada give us credit for.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.