[Arctic_Menace]

HAHAHA!!!! This guy is an asshole, but is so hilarious at the same time. I am laughing at him btw.....


http://www.canadianliberals.blogspot.com/

[MN_North_Star]

How quaint. I need to know whether or not the moderators of this site consider Islam to be a race. It is not a race, of course, but "progressives" have a habit of believing that it is a race.

So, on CKA, is Islam considered a race or just a death cult?

[Hardy]

Racism is just one way of being offensive and objectionable. From the Terms of Service:

$1:

You explicitly agree, in using this web site or any service provided, that you shall not:

(a) Provide any Content or perform any conduct that may be unlawful, illegal, threatening, harmful, abusive, harassing, stalking, tortious, defamatory, libelous, vulgar, obscene, offensive, objectionable, pornographic, designed to or does interfere or interrupt this web site or any service provided, infected with a virus or other destructive or deleterious programming routine, give rise to civil or criminal liability, or which may violate an applicable local, national or international law;

[..........]

(e) Provide any Content that may give rise to our civil or criminal liability or which may consititue or be considered a violation of any local, national or international law, including but not limited to laws relating to copyright, trademark, patent, or trade secrets.

[Regina]

MN_North_Star MN_North_Star:

How quaint. I need to know whether or not the moderators of this site consider Islam to be a race. It is not a race, of course, but "progressives" have a habit of believing that it is a race.

So, on CKA, is Islam considered a race or just a death cult?

You may consider it anything you like but I think most would not consider it a death cult. If you want to find out how far you can go with that line of thought go ahead. When you cross the line in the opinion of any of the mods here, you will be tossed in jail and if it's really bad, you may get the flat out banning.
How would you like to proceed?

[Arctic_Menace]

$1:

So, on CKA, is Islam considered a race or just a death cult?

And yet another fine example of why more and more Muslims continue to feel hatred toward us.

[Arctic_Menace]

$1:

Wrong. Muslims hate America because America is not muslim.


This is the reason why muslims hate America:

Way to Generalize.

I guess you know everything there is to know about Muslims and Islam, and we should all take your advice.

Not all Muslims hate America. Just the Extremists and their supporters.

And I'm pretty sure that Muslim extremists hate America for far many more reasons that a bit of skin showing...

[Jonas_Salk]

Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:

$1:

Wrong. Muslims hate America because America is not muslim.


This is the reason why muslims hate America:

Way to Generalize.

I guess you know everything there is to know about Muslims and Islam, and we should all take your advice.

Not all Muslims hate America. Just the Extremists and their supporters.

And I'm pretty sure that Muslim extremists hate America for far many more reasons that a bit of skin showing...

Yep, you're right. Only the "extremists" and their supporters hate us. Unfortunately for us, this tends to be well over half the Muslim population in Islamic countries.

Muslims hate us because they are Muslims and we are not; not for anything we've done. Christians have gotten far worse treatment in recent years in their own nations as far as criticizing Christ and the Bible, and yet you do not see Christians bombing buildings, suicide-bombing Mosques, burning Islamic embassies, and overall creating utter chaos. Islam is incompatible with the West as it is today. I urge you to watch the documentary "Islam: What the West Needs to Know" and to read Robert Spencer's books on the subject.

Unfortunately, I will likely not get much of a response from you, as you seem to be yet another of the "Islam = peace" types that are so common amongst young people here in the West.

[Indelible]

wow lots to read and i got lots to say....

$1:

Christians have gotten far worse treatment in recent years in their own nations as far as criticizing Christ and the Bible, and yet you do not see Christians bombing buildings, suicide-bombing Mosques, burning Islamic embassies, and overall creating utter chaos.

okay, so the islam thing is a little off course...but i can't help myself. i have to say something about this. while christians might not regularly send suicide bombers to blow up heavily populated market places, but if you really think about it "christians" are doing all the other things you mentioned except firebombing mosques, if i am correct. the problem is perspective. muslim acts of terror are very public nowadays; thanks to media everyone knows about it within a few hours, and it's always al qaeda, hamas etc did such and such bombing at so and so location. are there not "christians" in the armed forces of both canada and the US? is the man giving the orders not a "christian"? so how can you say that christians don't bomb buildings? i think it is fair to say that W. has created utter chaos in iraq.
i know the whole "moral relativism" thing has been beaten to death many times over in other threads and it's an old hat, but that's not my point. the moral relativism argument is something like 'we cannot condemn acts of terrorism because we are just as bad as they are' or 'we are good and they are bad' but that isn't the point i am making. i want to point out that it is incorrect to say that they are the only ones carrying out violent acts.

i know that i am gonna catch some flak for this because it sounds like moral relativism but it isn't.

gonna comment on another post in a sec.

[MN_North_Star]

Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:

$1:

Wrong. Muslims hate America because America is not muslim.


This is the reason why muslims hate America:

Way to Generalize.

I guess you know everything there is to know about Muslims and Islam, and we should all take your advice.

Not all Muslims hate America. Just the Extremists and their supporters.

And I'm pretty sure that Muslim extremists hate America for far many more reasons that a bit of skin showing...

Lanny Barbie does not simply show her skin. She engages in anal sexual intercourse, is ejaculated upon, has lesbian intercourse with her half-sister, etc... But good attempt to pretend that the average muslim is not puritanical relative to our culture here in the west. It is almost as good of an attempt as Hardy's... But allow me a rebuttal.





Does Arcade_Menace and Hardy understand this photo? If not, tell me so and I will explain it to you.




"are there not "christians" in the armed forces of both canada and the US?"
-Indelible.

Think, man. Think. Let's forget that you speak about our soldiers and pretend that you refered to murderers. Do christians who kill people do so because they are christian? Are they committing their crimes in the name of their religion? To they saw off heads and shout "Yay Jeebuz" while doing so? Yes, there are christian murderers and asssorted other speces of vermin on the planet but they do not kill in the name of their religion; they do it in spite of their religion. Not all violent muslims are violent because they are muslim either, however, there certainly is a global movement to commit violence in the name of their religion.

Have a look at the prophets of the two religions. Jesus was nearly a pacifist. He never killed anyone. Mohammad killed a lot of people, whether justifiable so or not. In addition to that Mohammad's favorite wife was Aisha, and he married her when she was six years old. It is spelled out right there in the koran. He "consummated" the marriage when he was fifty three years old, and Aisha was nine years old. Nine years old. Nine years old.

This is historical fact that muslims do not dispute.

[Indelible]

$1:

You explicitly agree, in using this web site or any service provided, that you shall not:

(a) Provide any Content or perform any conduct that may be unlawful, illegal, threatening, harmful, abusive, harassing, stalking, tortious, defamatory, libelous, vulgar, obscene, offensive, objectionable, pornographic, designed to or does interfere or interrupt this web site or any service provided, infected with a virus or other destructive or deleterious programming routine, give rise to civil or criminal liability, or which may violate an applicable local, national or international law;

i guess then that begs the question what is abusive and harassing? do flame wars fall into that category? yet while flame wars are discouraged, and have significantly decreased since i started posting here, they still happen. do flamers get jailed? if so, how bad does a flame have to be to earn a sentence? i suppose the same would apply to vulgar and obscene. does vulgarity include foul language? i personally don't care if a person swears, i do it too, though i try not to. what is vulgar? the "bangkok" pic in the "post your funny pics here" thread is.... kinda vulgar, but i don't find it offensive, same with the beer bong video i posted. that was totally disgusting but hilarious.
not going to touch the porn issue that was discussed in the "should we have a babes thread" thread.

another question i have is, am i wondering this because i have only partial info? your quote is obviously partial. i know that the guidelines are given when someone joins but that was 3 yrs ago for me! i tried looking around and found this:
http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... pic&t=5325
here the rules are pretty general, and if you read on ziggy raised some really good points, which are becoming relevant again. (don't get me wrong, i wouldn't allow racist posts either and i support the actions taken by the mods in this case)

canadaka:

$1:

yes we have never followed these rules strickly, basically its what dgthe3 said, don't be a jerk.

IF you are being a total ass, racist ext, and degrading the quality of the forums then you must be taken care of. Because if these types are not it will drive more people away then having some rules & guidlines. I know from experience this is true.

That said I believe CKA has been very open forums, we really have not had to perminatly ban very many people, very small number.

[Arctic_Menace]

$1:

Does Arcade_Menace and Hardy understand this photo?

You know, it is commonly known that making utterly pathetic attempts at name calling only shows weakness in the attacker...


Try again...

[Indelible]

$1:

Think, man. Think. Let's forget that you speak about our soldiers and pretend that you refered to murderers. Do christians who kill people do so because they are christian? Are they committing their crimes in the name of their religion? To they saw off heads and shout "Yay Jeebuz" while doing so? Yes, there are christian murderers and asssorted other speces of vermin on the planet but they do not kill in the name of their religion; they do it in spite of their religion. Not all violent muslims are violent because they are muslim either, however, there certainly is a global movement to commit violence in the name of their religion.

Have a look at the prophets of the two religions. Jesus was nearly a pacifist. He never killed anyone. Mohammad killed a lot of people, whether justifiable so or not. In addition to that Mohammad's favorite wife was Aisha, and he married her when she was six years old. It is spelled out right there in the koran. He "consummated" the marriage when he was fifty three years old, and Aisha was nine years old. Nine years old. Nine years old.

This is historical fact that muslims do not dispute.

but that's not what the post i responded to said. it made no distinction between killing for religion and killing inspite of religion, neither did i. i guess that's where the line between moral relativism and what i was trying to say lies.
also, your point is entirely valid.
it also reinforces what i was trying to say, in a way.
if a person really IS a christian, and not a "christian" would they not follow the teachings of Jesus who was/is a pacifist? did the bible say "thou shalt not commit murder, unless it's for a good cause"?

[Streaker]

Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:

$1:

Does Arcade_Menace and Hardy understand this photo?

You know, it is commonly known that making utterly pathetic attempts at name calling only shows weakness in the attacker...


Try again...

Arky, you can't expect too much of a guy from fuckfrance.com

[HyperionTheEvil]

MN_North_Star MN_North_Star:

Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:

$1:

So, on CKA, is Islam considered a race or just a death cult?

And yet another fine example of why more and more Muslims continue to feel hatred toward us.

Wrong. Muslims hate America because America is not muslim.


This is the reason why muslims hate America:




Yes, she is Canadian but she may as well be American, as far as muslims are concerned.

America is hated by muslims not because of its foreign policy, but because of its domestic policy.


As for what is offensive, derogatory, inflamatory, etc... It is all in the eye of the beholder. One of the worst policies that any western nation can enact is a right to not be offended. Everything is offensive to someone.

Good choice by the way


Lanny Barbie!

[Hardy]

MN_North_Star MN_North_Star:

It is spelled out right there in the koran. He "consummated" the marriage when he was fifty three years old, and Aisha was nine years old. Nine years old. Nine years old.

This is historical fact that muslims do not dispute.

In the Talmud it has lengthy discussion of consumating marriages to girls between the ages of 3 and 9.

"Today, in many parts of North Africa, Arabia, and India, girls are wedded and bedded between the ages of five and nine; and no self-respecting female remains unmarried beyond the age of puberty." -- Masters and Edwards, The Cradle of Erotica, 1962

Under the Common Law the age of consent was 10, and a century ago in France it was still 11. In the 1800s in the US, the most common age of consent was 10, but in some states it was as low as 7. Today in Spain, Mexico and Brazil, 12 year olds aren't jailbait.

The standards for these things have changed dramatically (in the west) over the last century or so. In the 8th century, little girls were getting screwed all over the world. Six centuries later King John of England married a 12 year old when he was 32, and it wasn't even considered worthy of comment.

In the historical context, it's nothing, I'm afraid.