[RUEZ]

Blue_Nose wrote:

Honestly, some of the conversations we have on a regular basis could be much more damaging than some pictures of girls.

There's not much chance of making this a "child safe" site.

Oh didn't you know? There is going to be some censoring from now on. No more bad words. Atleast that's what I was led to believe, Hey Mario?

[grainfedprairieboy]

Since I am not a regular in the babes forum I am basing my opinion on assumptions the first of which is that the girls are all in bathing suits or lingerie etc. Secondly, why should it not be permitted to see girls on bathing suits on CKA yet topless women can walk the streets of Ontario without breaking any law?

[Canadaka]

im less concerned about the "child safe" thing over possibly offending some female members.

[grainfedprairieboy]

Canadaka wrote:

im less concerned about the "child safe" thing over possibly offending some female members.

Then post some pictures for the girls and Iceowl

[kitty]

Canadaka wrote:

im less concerned about the "child safe" thing over possibly offending some female members.

[RUEZ]

grainfedprairieboy wrote:

Canadaka wrote:

im less concerned about the "child safe" thing over possibly offending some female members.

Then post some pictures for the girls and Iceowl

[Blue_Nose]

kitty wrote:

Canadaka wrote:

im less concerned about the "child safe" thing over possibly offending some female members.

I think that answers your question, Trevor

[Tricks]

xerxes wrote:

That, and the fact that we do have members who are legal minors.

You know all those "You must be over 18 to enter this site" things. Do you really think ANYONE follows those?

[Tricks]

grainfedprairieboy wrote:

xerxes wrote:

That, and the fact that we do have members who are legal minors.

So do porn sites. It is the responsibility of the minors guardian to control what they observe or consume and not CKA's.

R=UP

[Tricks]

Canadaka wrote:

im less concerned about the "child safe" thing over possibly offending some female members.

R=UP

[Canadaka]

since the vote is 50/50
I will just start with not displaying babe topics in the forum recent topics list. making this a "go to" forum.

[Indelible]

[ponygurl]

Blue_Nose wrote:

Honestly, some of the conversations we have on a regular basis could be much more damaging than some pictures of girls.

There's not much chance of making this a "child safe" site.

Your reasoning is off BlueNose..Just because other things are "more offensive" or "more wrong" doesn't mean something" less wrong" should be overlooked.
Especially when the "less offensive" involves minors unable to make proper or ethical decisions for themselves.

Protect the children.