Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6138
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 2:35 pm
 


So, is Diefenbaker and the Cuban Missile Crisis one of Canada's dark secrets, thus why it doesn't seem to be discussed all that much, or is it actively acknowledged by Canadians?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4048
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 2:48 pm
 


Quote:
So, is Diefenbaker and the Cuban Missile Crisis one of Canada's dark secrets, thus why it doesn't seem to be discussed all that much, or is it actively acknowledged by Canadians?


It's not a secret (can read about it in books about the RCN, the Missile Crisis, etc), but I can guarantee you that 9 out of 10 Canadians know nothing about it. Hell I bet a majority of Canadians don't even know the RCN was deployed during the Crisis and playing cat and mouse with the Soviets. It's a matter of ignorance.

Like so much of our history.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 San Jose Sharks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30228
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 5:51 pm
 


sandorski wrote:
Heads would roll if I were PM


A more profound truth has yet to be written.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14939
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 7:48 pm
 


saturn_656 wrote:
Scape wrote:
Having a military that can not be trusted to maintain order is worse then having no military at all. Bolting under fire is in no way justified. They could have easily tipped the precarious situation out of control by their actions. Thankfully that was not the case and they were alive to be relived of command.

We can all look in hindsight and judge with what we know now but the fact remains that the acted without orders and without a chain of command there is no order. Instead of a military we have a street gang with better equipment.


The Soviets were cruising towards North America, cocked, locked and ready to rock with nuclear weapons... and if it were up to that damned fool Dief the Canadian military would have been on the collective john with its pants around its ankles when the shooting began.

Canada needed a leader. In that dark hour we found it in the Defence Minister and the Admiralty.

The Prime Minister?

Who knows where the fuck he was. Sure as hell wasn't paying attention to the current events, that's for damned sure.


Moot point. At best we would be just underfoot of the major players either way. Showing up late didn't matter because our presence wasn't required. If anything it would only serve to piss off the boys with nukes.

Did Deif fuck up? No. It was his watch and his call. If he fucked up we wouldn't be talking about it. He had every reason to doubt JFK then just as we had doubts about Vietnam and Iraq. Having the balls to say no to BS is called sovereignty. It's important to be an ally when the bullets start flying but we can't afford to be anyone bitch to have our boys catching lead for someone elses war like a bunch of lemmings.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4048
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:45 pm
 


Quote:
Moot point. At best we would be just underfoot of the major players either way. Showing up late didn't matter because our presence wasn't required. If anything it would only serve to piss off the boys with nukes.


Canadian RCAF and RCN aircraft provided ASW in areas where American aircraft could not operate due to insufficient capabilities. Land based Argus aircraft and Trackers off the Bonaventure were involved in this aspect.

Canadian ships stepped up their tempo of operations along the American eastern seaboard so those ships could be diverted to the blockade zone and also tracked Soviet subs while working with American subs.

Quote:
Canadian ASW Operations
A logical point of departure to re-look at Canadian ASW operations is the
sighting of the “Zulu”-class submarine alongside the fleet auxiliary, Terek, on 22 October.
Those who participated in the operations in the Canadian area agree that this was the start
of the ASW side of the crisis. There are accounts of a second submarine sighting in the
general area north of the Azores two days later, but they were never substantiated. It is far
more likely that the “Zulu”-class sighted on 22 October returned to its patrol station off
the northeastern seaboard after replenishing from Terek. If this was so, then the contact
gained and held intermittently by RCAF Argus aircraft from 26 to 29 October was the
same submarine – the speed of advance was a steady five knots which is realistic, but it
cannot be given any classification higher than “possible” because it was never sighted,
contact was only maintained acoustically. Contact was lost on the 29th at the same time
as all the submarines, even those in the Caribbean went silent as the crisis reached its
most dangerous point. However, contact was gained on another possible submarine late
on 2 November as it tried to seek shelter in the Soviet fishing fleet working Georges
Bank in the Gulf of Maine.
The location of this new contact was consistent with the
projected speed of advance of the contact held earlier and, more significantly, it made
absolute sense for a submarine to seek out the fishing fleet and replenish from the tanker
Atlantika which was also there. Further, the ELINT vessel Shkval, which was suspected of supporting Soviet submarines, was in the same general area and had been moving
around the areas being used by the Canadian Navy and RCAF for ASW operations. That
some Soviet fishing vessels tried to drive off Canadian destroyers attempting to pin down
the submarine seems to increase the level of probability. But that was not the only contact
in the area. While this contact kept the Canadian maritime forces busy, a completely
separate submarine contact was occupying the US Navy in an area about 250 nautical
miles to the east of Cape Hatteras. This contact was in the same general area as the
ELINT trawler Shkval which had been sighted on 29 October.
The RCAF was also involved in the US Navy’s ASW barrier established between
Newfoundland and the Azores on 27 October. Once the barrier was in place the US Navy
had to ask Canada for help in providing air cover (in a “pouncer” role while also
providing additional surveillance coverage) for the patrol area furthest from
Newfoundland because the US Navy’s Lockheed P2V Neptune patrol aircraft did not
have the necessary endurance to maintain a useful patrol there whereas the RCAF Argus
did. This support was provided from 29 October. Although the barrier’s main purpose
was to catch submarines in transit between their home bases and patrol areas, concern
existed that a missile-firing “Zulu”-- or “Golf”--class might be in the area and might
attempt to close to firing range (about 350 nautical miles).
The planned response in such
situations was to arm the patrol aircraft with a nuclear depth bomb (NDB) to be used as a
countermeasure of last resort if a submarine attempted to launch missiles. Little reliable
information is available on the RCAF barrier task or on the possibility that RCAF Argus
embarked NDBs, and so that remains one of the remaining mysteries of the Cuban
Missile Crisis.
By the middle of the day on 27 October, American and Canadian naval staffs
agreed that contact had been made on seven separate Soviet submarines: four in the area
to the east of the Windward Passage (the four “Foxtrots”), one in the area to the south of
Cuba, and two in the WESTLANT/Canadian area.
Contact had also been made with
several other possible Soviet submarines, but these did not have the same degree of
reliability. The situation was confusing and gave rise to considerable concern. For
instance, on 30 October the commander of RCAF maritime air forces, Air Commodore
Clements, informed the chief of the Air Staff that even though the view from Ottawa was
that the crisis was practically over, the submarines had not left the area. In his own words,
“there have been 5 positive, two highly probable, and 4 possible submarines in Western
Atlantic in last week. No indication yet of any movement out of that area. Never since
last war has such a situation existed.


Quote:
Did Deif fuck up? No. It was his watch and his call. If he fucked up we wouldn't be talking about it.


Dief got lucky that first, US-Soviet diplomatic efforts produced results in the nick of time, and second, that his inaction was corrected for by others.

It isn't any kind of secret that Dief and Kennedy had not much care for each other, but Dief picked a really poor time to try and piss Kennedy off and make a point, with Ivan rolling into the neighbourhood with the United States AND Canada in the crosshairs.

Quote:
Having the balls to say no to BS is called sovereignty.


You call it balls, I call it one of two things. Either Dief couldn't resist an opportunity to piss off John (at the expense of our national defence) or he genuinely had no idea what the hell was going on down around Cuba.

And on the topic of sovereignty, Diefenbaker was hardly one to squak about it. Under his watch the Canadian military aviation industry died a painful death, in its place we got (useless) BOMARC's and unguided nuclear missiles locked down under a dual key system. Our Air Force could not deploy its more powerful weapons systems (BOMARC's and CF-101's with Genie Missiles) without American authorization.

What did he know about sovereignty again?

Quote:
we can't afford to be anyone bitch to have our boys catching lead for someone elses war like a bunch of lemmings.


It wouldn't have been "someone elses war", make no mistake it would have been our war. You don't bomb Detriot and spare Windsor.

If the rounds started to fly, we would have been a target. Our military facilities and cities. And Dief thought it good idea not to have the military at ready when the world was at the closest it had ever been to World War 3.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4597
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:10 pm
 


saturn_656 wrote:
Quote:
So, is Diefenbaker and the Cuban Missile Crisis one of Canada's dark secrets, thus why it doesn't seem to be discussed all that much, or is it actively acknowledged by Canadians?


It's not a secret (can read about it in books about the RCN, the Missile Crisis, etc), but I can guarantee you that 9 out of 10 Canadians know nothing about it. Hell I bet a majority of Canadians don't even know the RCN was deployed during the Crisis and playing cat and mouse with the Soviets. It's a matter of ignorance.

Like so much of our history.



The only way most of them have ever heard about it is from the movie 13 days. So, you can understand that it has more of a sense of hollywood than reality for most people, especially since movies usually can't convey the feeling of fear and anxiety that the people felt.

But I can attest that, after living my formative years hiding under the desk at school everytime the Air Raid Siren sounded it was a pretty dark and trying time and while we didn't see Canadian Ships per se in the news we definately saw alot of American ships and Russian cargo carriers and escorts squaring off.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6138
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:32 pm
 


Scape wrote:
It's important to be an ally when the bullets start flying but we can't afford to be anyone bitch to have our boys catching lead for someone elses war like a bunch of lemmings.


Canada was already actively involved with NATO, and as such, we were just as much of a target of those Soviet nukes as were the Americans. If the Cuban Missile Crisis turned into WWIII, we would have been in the line of fire.

If Canada was more directly threatened by the Soviets, and Kennedy said "Meh, don't care", would you support the Americans not being a bunch of lemmings for "someone elses war"?


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14939
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:18 pm
 


And if we provoked WWIII we would all be dead, NATO alliance or not. Which would be a good reason to 2nd guess any rash act.

Let's say that Deif was 100% on the money about JFK and the whole act was a ruse for political gain but we trigger WWIII. We all die right? Hell of a downside.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6138
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:41 pm
 


Scape wrote:
And if we provoked WWIII we would all be dead, NATO alliance or not. Which would be a good reason to 2nd guess any rash act.

Let's say that Deif was 100% on the money about JFK and the whole act was a ruse for political gain but we trigger WWIII. We all die right? Hell of a downside.


How do we trigger WWIII exactly? Just by mobilizing? All of NATO was mobilizing, and we were on the brink of war. Canada not mobilizing would basically mean Canada being unprepared, and telling NATO that we would not back up our part of the alliance. Not (officially) mobilizing wouldn't have spared Canada from Armageddon, if it occurred. Calling mobilizing a rash act when a war might start is a bit extreme. Mobilizing for no reason at all might be a provocation to war.

Diefenbaker was basically telling the Americans and Europe that we would not stand as a united front against possible conflict with the USSR. The whole point of the alliance is that, well, you're mutually agreeing to stand by one another during a time of military conflict or crisis, and the Cuban Missile Crisis was a clear cut example of the Soviets making the first step to war.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Previous  1  2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.