mtbr wrote:
bootlegga wrote:
What this article leaves out is that evil eastern corporations spent huge sums of money buidling factories and railroads to produce goods and transport them for CANADIAN consumption, not Ontario, Quebec or Alberta, but Canadian consumption. So why should those companies not lobby government to have higher tariffs on cheaper foreign made goods? Don't people here complain about cheap Chinese goods all the time? Why are cheap American goods okay, but cheap Chinese goods aren't? After all, the USA was the world's sweatshop in the late 19th century, so the parallel to me seems hypocritical.
What many people also do not realize is that the Canadian government's sole form of taxation prior to WW1 was tariffs and duties on foreign made goods. There was no national sales tax and income was only instituted in 1916 to pay for the war. So if they don't tax cheap American goods, then how does the Canadian government pay its bills?
This article also glosses over the fact that in the 1920s-30s, almost 50% of West's immigrants came from the US. That's a big reason for so-called the 'lack of anti-Americanism' in the West. After all, how many of them would come out and say they hate Aunt Ethel and Uncle Henry (even if they are boorish drunks)? Many of them came north looking to make a fortune and settled here, bringing with them their attitudes on guns, crime, personal rights et al.
They came north to a land of opportunity just like the ones from the east or the rest of the world. No need for the anti-american stereotype.
I simply said that a huge majority of immigrants to Alberta were from the US. They brought their attitudes with them, instead of assimilating (as most righties here want everyone to these days). It stands to reason that they also had children who, likely with whom they share similar views. Hence, the 'lack' of anti-Americanism in Alberta.
If telling the truth is anti-American, then feel free to label me as such.
uwish wrote:
and that attitude on guns, crime and personal rights are bad? I think not.
Maybe that is why the 'west' is the largest supporter of property rights, etc etc. Or do you like the fact the government can come and take YOUR legally owned property from you WITHOUT compensation?
If you do, then there is a MAJOR difference in west and 'non west' and I for one, will never yield from the western perspective.
I never said property rights were a bad thing, I just tried to exaplin where it came from, as the article doesn't even bother to mention it.