[ASLplease]

This poll is for law abiding citizens that are anti-gun.

If you are not law abiding, or if you are not anti-gun, please do not vote in this poll.

[sandorski]

Pointless Poll.

[ridenrain]

Sadly it is pointless because all Lefties believe their the exception and far above the common riff-raffwho cant' be trusted. There's lots of examples in the states of anti-gun lefties who have been caught with guns for that very reason.

[Thanos]

At least you could have added more options such as "maybe" or "depends on how drunk I am".

[Refreshed]

I voted 'Yes.' I'm not anti-gun per se. I believe they're necessary for our protection and I don't have a problem with law-abiding citizens having them if they're responsible and properly trained individuals.

I do however believe in gun control -- not to the extent Canada has now -- but a bit.

[sandorski]

I trust myself with a Nuke, should I have one?

[ridenrain]

Your dangerous enough because we already trust you with a vote.

[EyeBrock]

Personally I'm ok with farmers etc having shotguns, but people who have handguns and don't need them for work worry me. It must be the English in me but I'm uneasy with AR-15's on sale at US Walmarts.

[Lemmy]

I would have voted "yes" but I'm ineligible on the 'law abiding' clause.

[EyeBrock]

Lemmy wrote:

I would have voted "yes" but I'm ineligible on the 'law abiding' clause.

No guns for you Lemmy!

[Lemmy]

EyeBrock wrote:

Lemmy wrote:

I would have voted "yes" but I'm ineligible on the 'law abiding' clause.

No guns for you Lemmy!

Sorry, mate, but I already own a few, including my grand-dad's Lee-Enfield from WWI. I also have an old .22 and a 12-guage, also inherited. Remember that silly Liberal Registry thingy there a few years back? When the gun registry was introduced, I was a good citizen and tried to register my weapons. Problem is, made-in-1913 British military weapons don't have serial numbers. "No Serial Number" is not an option on the registry, so, after much correspondence, they decided that the .303 didn't need to be included on my registry.

So, not only have we pissed away how many billion dollars on the registry? But among registrants, at least some of us, haven't had to register ALL our weapons due to administrative/software SNAFUs.

But don't worry, EyeBrock, I have no intentions of using my guns as anything but heirlooms. I don't hunt, I'm rich enough that I don't need to rob. If I ever snap and want to kill someone, I'm pretty sure I'll just use hands. But if I do go off my head and go on an armed rampage, I'm not a very good shot so I doubt anyone would be injured.

[EyeBrock]

Rich enough eh? Lend me $20?

[Lemmy]

EyeBrock wrote:

Rich enough eh? Lend me $20?

Rich enough that if you really need $20, it's yours...no need to call it a loan, mate.

[EyeBrock]

Thank you Squire......!

[Lemmy]

You're not behind to your pimp again, are you?