Godz46 Godz46:
Well...apart from having a say on weapons flying in your own airspace, and being present when important decisions are made...and having a greter sense of secuirty within your borders...and having a detterent from future terrorists or rogue states....nothing.
Your right, for once. NOTHING. What if we didn't want missiles flying overhead. Crazy idea right? Do you seriously believe a strongly written letter by the PM of Canada is going to stop the US from firing anyway if we are on board or not? Where is Alaska Godz? And where are China's missiles going to come from? Will we have any real say ever?
Godz46 Godz46:
I'm sorry. But I don't see how putting up a defense....again defense mechanism is an invitation for aggression. I mean, I just installed an house alarm security system the other day. Does that make me a legitimate target for thieves in the future now that I have installed it? Or will it be viewed as a detterent? I'm not criminal, but my insticts tell me the criminals will view it as the later. Same thing with BMD, putting up a defense system to prevent a missile attack is hardly an act of aggression.
Clearly you do not understand the relationship of deterrence and how it is used to keep a balance of terror. I must repeat myself it seams and show you again. I'll type slower this time.
$1:
Russia and China share two key concerns about American missile defense plans: that their nuclear deterrent is threatened and that American missile defense plans will destabilize arms control. The threat posed is far more immediate for China, whose nuclear forces are Lilliputian in comparison to American and Russian nuclear arsenals.
Deterrence is like a game of Jenga. Remember that one with a tower of wooden blocks? Well as technology evolves we are taking blocks from the middle and putting them on top. Every nation that has nuclear weapons takes a block whenever ANY technology is used to undermine their nuclear deterrent and destabilize arms control. IE the tower will fall. As the computer in war games said, "The only winning move is not to play".
Godz46 Godz46:
Shackling yourself with the US for a common intrest of not being hit by a future missile attack is no ball-in chain. But rather a community program like "Neighborhood Watch" where people in a single community work together to make their area more safer. Are people who sign on Neighborhood watch giving up independace for joining such a program?
It's not the Neighborhood Watch we will be signing on to it will be the local Mafia Don who will demand his 'take' of our income. THAT is extortion. Japan has already bought up trillions of US treasury dollars in debt to keep the dollar afloat and they lose 7 billion for every cent it drops if we sign on we will be hitching our wagon not to a tree stump but to the Titanic.
Godz46 Godz46:
Conclusion, due to the geographic factors between Canada and the US, Canada needs to shackle up on military matters with the US for regional security purposes. Just like Australia and New Zeland. South Korea and Japan and Europe.
No, only the US is pushing the BMD. This is causing everyone else to make missiles that are even more powerful to defeat it to keep the balance of terror the same. If anyone starts thinking actually using WMD is even remotely 'feasible' and that is what BMD is all about, then war will erupt.You are a mad man for even thinking this will work.
Worries about weapons
Notice how Japan has dealt with China all this time using a pacifist constitution? Now Japan, US and Tiawan are circling the wagons vs China. This has triggered a response and now China is being sold weapons from the EU. You conventional strategy of containment is being outflanked and India and Russia look to be siding with China over the US on this leaving the US, not China, the odd man out.