N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
Why wouldn't she use MSM coverage? It's called fair use and if you want to get childish they've used hers. If you want to talk about unfair treatment she's taken a lot more crap from the Mainstream media than they ever have from her.
If the MSM is the enemy and purposely trying to hurt her career, why would she use their coverage?
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
As to the actual issue you mention:
There was an apartment fire. Rentals.
1500 Toronto residents were put out on the streets. Homeless.
In the meantime illegal border jumpers were being put up in hotels on the taxpayer dime.
Faith says Toronto first.
Compare anything you want to that. See how many votes you get from Torontoians on the street.
Explain the full story to people on the street, and people will get it. We can't just accept refugees, illegal or not and leave them homeless. We have legal obligations and accepting these people is not the jurisdiction of the City of Toronto.
When you explain the whole story and discuss our legal obligations, people may not agree like it, but they'll understand.
When you purposely leave out facts, as you and Faith keep doing, you lack credibility as you're intentionally misleading people.
On the fire; all 1500 residents were not homeless. Some of them had insurance.
It's not the job of the government to provide for people who choose not to have insurance on their rented property. As I've said previously, if my house burns down, it's not on the taxpayers to fund my accommodations if I don't have insurance.