Gunnair wrote:
andyt wrote:
You judge him but not them. I haven't read most of the back and forth, but my impression is that as soon as Eureka says anything, Shep is spewing at him and Gunnair's not far behind.
It shows you haven't really read my position, you're once again knee jerking into a circle jerk with anyone on the receiving end of my ire irrespective if why.
I will note your feelings once the pair if you get into a debate about the status of our natives or immigration, which I believe you two are not all that close on. So far you're in his good books because you're such a great cheerleader, but when you cross the line from being one if his toadies to opposing his viewpoint, I think you'll see a change.
You do the same with Eureka as you do with me - argue from a position you don't really believe in just to argue and hurl insults, but wrap yourself in the flag of righteousness about it. Sounds sanctimonious to me.
I bet there's all kinds of topics Eureka and I disagree with. I don't support him because I agree with him, but because of how he's being treated here. He's no worse than many others on this forum. If the time comes that he and I have a set to, no doubt the insults will fly in both directions. But I won't hound him across topics, and if I agree with him on something I'll say so, same as I do with you. That's where I see the difference between you and I.
I often argue from a position that is contrary to the utopian/panacea/outright retarded position the pair of you grab on to.
With Eureka, I've already stated my point. With you, your positions are not often terribly idiotic though you usually are.
CKA Uber 
