[OnTheIce]

DerbyX wrote:

OnTheIce wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

BTW, Its spelt correctly.

Genius, my user name is one word. It's not On The Ice. Just try harder next time, champ. We know you can do it. Just ignore that big bar at the bottom of your keyboard.

Did you wanna try another?

Spacing and spelling are two different things sunshine. You claim you wanted to be a non partisan but you proved you are just as bad a hack as ridenrain. We know now that your "C" is well earned.

Off you go now sunshine. I'm done with you.

Yep, cause "Mc Donalds" is the same as "McDonalds", shit.....

Putting a space into a word where there isn't one, makes the spelling of said word, incorrect.

[DerbyX]

Whatever sunshine.

Boy, I must have really busted you ass proving Harpers broken promises were more numerous then any Liberal ones. You haven't said word one in defense and spent all your time crying about me in ad hominem attacks.

[OnTheIce]

DerbyX wrote:

Whatever sunshine.

Boy, I must have really busted you ass proving Harpers broken promises were more numerous then any Liberal ones. You haven't said word one in defense and spent all your time crying about me in ad hominem attacks.

I must thank you so very much, for proving your post was indeed loaded with partisan babble.

I'm going to now reply to your post, to continue the "ownage" there.

[DerbyX]

OnTheIce wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

Whatever sunshine.

Boy, I must have really busted you ass proving Harpers broken promises were more numerous then any Liberal ones. You haven't said word one in defense and spent all your time crying about me in ad hominem attacks.

I must thank you so very much, for proving your post was indeed loaded with partisan babble.

I'm going to now reply to your post, to continue the "ownage" there.

I think you should reread your participation there sunshine. The posts show I responded to your (ahem) call for a non-partisan debate.

[ridenrain]

After 2 1/2 pages of this, we're still left with Dion.. oops, Iggy scrapping his critical blue ribbon panel and a boatload of bluster over nothing. what did he acchieve? Certainly nothing in the way of credability.
All the talk and secret probation and he wasted the whole summer selling books and vacationing.

[DerbyX]

Actually we have a whole hoard of cons unwilling to admit Harpers hypocrisy.

[ridenrain]

Please don't drag other threads into this one. This is about Iggy's EI demands and he folded like a house of cards.

I wonder if this had anything to do with Harper and layton's meeting. It might be that they made a deal that tool the NDP backing from the 360 plan, leving Iggy in the cold.

[DerbyX]

No. Harper set a target and was accused of forcing an election.

Harper promised no deficits and changed his mind. He folded fast on that.

[ridenrain]

.. and you bitched at Harper and the Conservatives for being ideological and now your bitching because they became pragmatic. Wake up to a new political dawn.

We both know that politics is the art of walking the razor edge of support and that's a different thing than the fickle illusion of popularity. I definitely admit my party went places I don't like but that's the difference between dialogs and pragmatists. Only if we're in power can we make the changes I support and I believe we will. We'll definately never see them when the status quoe is in power.

[Praxius]

ridenrain wrote:

It's not about me. It's about Iggy talking tough then slinking away.
Did he learn that from Dion?

From Dion?

Hmmm.... probably, but when I read this through again:

"Employment insurance was the big issue in June as Michael Ignatieff and Stephen Harper locked horns in a classic minority Parliament power play, but Liberals now say it's just one file among many and EI will not trigger a fall vote."

Sorta reminds me of how Bush went on the war path for Osama and then eventually did a 180 and said he wasn't that important and just one guy among many..... even though both wars began with Osama being public enemy #1 with Saddam apparently being linked to him.

There's also Harper who after the last election claimed he would work more with the other parties and make government more functional..... yet the very first day back into work he flung crap directly at the other parties which made them have no other choice but go on the defense and thus, created the Coalition fiasco.

Or how about Harper and his big argument about the Senators and needing to be elected, yet for the second time, just hand picked his own buddies to pamper his ass further and to make his grip of power more stronger?

All were conservative supporters...... talk about obviously going for a further power grab, as if the last election wasn't enough.

Iggy's certainly nothing to write home about, but I would prance around acting like your party is all king sh*t perfect.

[Praxius]

ridenrain wrote:

.. and you bitched at Harper and the Conservatives for being ideological and now your bitching because they became pragmatic. Wake up to a new political dawn.

We both know that politics is the art of walking the razor edge of support and that's a different thing than the fickle illusion of popularity. I definitely admit my party went places I don't like but that's the difference between dialogs and pragmatists. Only if we're in power can we make the changes I support and I believe we will. We'll definately never see them when the status quoe is in power.

The status quo is in power, lol....

Liberals.... Conservatives..... Liberals.... Conservatives.... Liberals..... Conservatives.....

Meet the new boss.... same as the old boss.

Pretty status quo to me..... both parties finger pointing at the faults of the other, while completely ignoring the exact same faults each reflect.

[leewgrant]

Iggy - Dion without the pleasant personality.

[PublicAnimalNo9]

DerbyX wrote:

OnTheIce wrote:

Naturally you thought it was very non-partisan.

You're only capable of partisanship, so you must be trying really, really hard but the partisanship busts out of your mouth like diarrhea out of a baby.

Like I said. You are just as bad as rr no matter how much you claim you aren't.

You can't defeat a single point I made illustrating just how bad Harper was at reneging on his promises so you launch partisan ad hominem attacks. My mistake for trying to debate you.

On yer bike sunshine.

Yeah, Harper is just as bad as Martin, The Cretin, Moosejaw, and from a provincial perspective, McSquinty, Rae, Lyin Klein, and many others I'm sure.

I got a little secret for y'all.....politicians lie shhhhhhh

[CommanderSock]

Welfare is not a good election issue I'm glad he came to his senses.

I bet whevener the next election is it will be a minority of some kind. Canada is very politically polarized and shall remain so indefinitely.