CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11539
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 6:21 pm
 


Not as scary as the title sounds, lol.

Here's the story courtesy of the CBC. It's about
government employees (OH NO!) literally spreading
the Pro-Seal Hunt message via online debating via
Canadian message boards and forums. They are "trained".

It's interesting and lol, I wonder if people are going to freak out about it.

CBC.ca wrote:
Bureaucrats monitor online forums
Last Updated: Sunday, May 23, 2010 | 10:43 AM ET
The Canadian Press


The next time you post an opinion in an online forum or a Facebook group message board, don't be surprised if you get a rebuttal from a federal employee.

The government is looking for ways to monitor online chatter about political issues and correct what it perceives as misinformation.

The move started recently with a pilot project on the East Coast seal hunt. A Toronto-based company called Social Media Group has been hired to help counter some information put forward by the anti-sealing movement.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade has paid the firm $75,000 "to monitor social activity and help identify … areas where misinformation is being presented and repeated as fact," Simone MacAndrew, a department spokesperson, said in an email.

Employees trained in online posting for seal hunt topics

The firm alerts the government to questionable online comments and then employees in Foreign Affairs or the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, who have recently been trained in online posting, point the authors to information the government considers more accurate.

It appears to be just the beginning.

The seal hunt pilot project was set up in part "to establish foundations and recommendations for future programs and campaigns to use social media as another way to listen to, inform and engage with Canadians," MacAndrew added.

For some, the move to online monitoring was to be expected.

"I think we're seeing the government recognize that millions of Canadians are actively participating online in social networks," said Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa who specializes in internet law.

"We've had Facebook groups in Canada that have grown to the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of people, and they've clearly had a direct impact on public policy."

Geist himself launched such a Facebook group in 2007. He managed to get more than 84,000 members to help denounce a proposed copyright law that critics said would have restricted the way in which people use, copy or share books, movies and music they purchase.

The bill was eventually put up for public consultations and is expected to be reintroduced in Parliament in the coming days. It remains to be seen, however, whether the online group managed to convince the government to alter the bill.

The commercial seal hunt might be an ideal test case for government involvement in online debate. The issue has polarized Canadians.

Opponents call the hunt cruel and needless and say seals are sometimes skinned alive or killed as whitecoated newborns. Supporters point out that regulations governing the hunt forbid both tactics and the hunt is heavily monitored. They accuse opponents of spreading lies by having celebrities such as Paul McCartney pose with whitecoat seals, pleading for their protection.

Some groups are wary of government employees being paid to post comments.

"I would certainly hope they would be up front about who they are," said Sheryl Fink, a senior researcher with the International Fund for Animal Welfare, a group which has long opposed the seal hunt.

"I think it does [help] if it's a link to an actual study. If it's a link to a press release that's got inaccurate information, that's not helping at all. It's, I guess, the distinction between the communications side of the government departments … and the actual science or data."

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/05/ ... z0onzf3fSD


Lol, these employees can have fun trying to get involved in forums
as a newbie for their first year there. Maybe they'll look like dicks.

Or it all could be fine and interesting and beneficial to Canada after all, :D

I wonder if there are evil government agents on on CKA right now!

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/05/ ... oring.html


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4048
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 6:29 pm
 


I wouldn't mind getting paid to post here... gov't PR agents take note. :lol:


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6452
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 6:31 pm
 


If it's for correcting misinformation and lies, why not. If it's to promote an ideology, now that's a problem.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11539
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 6:36 pm
 


Proculation wrote:
If it's for correcting misinformation and lies, why not. If it's to promote an ideology, now that's a problem.

"Misinformation", "Lies"... I dunno, sounds like something Stalin would say.

In a fair note, I'm sure environmentalists everywhere are pissed.

But in that case CKA doesn't have much of a problem.
Who here is an environmentalist actively? Lol.


Offline
Forum Junkie
Forum Junkie
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 729
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 3:24 am
 


I'm sure some folks hate me because I have some environmentalist leanings but I largely believe in prudence so that throws it all out.

I'll have to say what I said on the other thread on the topic, the media knew, and was told, when it was a pilot program for a largely peripheral issue which is a polarized topic with a ton of misleading information involved. There is no indication that these people are not going to make their identities clear and they'd have to survive us forum goers to get their message out. :D

A lot of papers and such out there are funded by environmentalists or made by environmentalists, even though those doing the work often lack the credentials to do so, yet, still, they manage to be considered scientifically valid pieces of work. I know this is not indicative of all areas of work, and may not be of this one, but after having seen the credentials of a lot of the UN AGW group I've become less than enamoured with a lot of the leading environment journals as of late.

Also, boo-hiss on the Stalin/Hitler/Commie/Socialist/Mussolini/Fascist card, people need to stop going to extremes when talking about moderate politics, lol, so I have a knee-jerk reaction whenever I see the names in such a context. Us Canadians are too cranky and cantankerous to be ardent in anything too extreme as a whole. :D


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11539
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:36 am
 


Khar wrote:
Also, boo-hiss on the Stalin/Hitler/Commie/Socialist/Mussolini/Fascist card, people need to stop going to extremes when talking about moderate politics, lol, so I have a knee-jerk reaction whenever I see the names in such a context. Us Canadians are too cranky and cantankerous to be ardent in anything too extreme as a whole. :D

It was a joke, sorry. :lol:


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.