[DerbyX]

Its funny that you didn't complain when riden tried to use a single example but did complain when you thought I was.

[Regina]

DerbyX wrote:

Its funny that you didn't complain when riden tried to use a single example but did complain when you thought I was.

I find the whole political hack thing moronic yet you've chosen to play victim.......again.

Take your pick......

canadian-politics-f17/and-harper-still-won-t-accept-her-resignation-t75629-105.html

[DerbyX]

Regina wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

Its funny that you didn't complain when riden tried to use a single example but did complain when you thought I was.

I find the whole fucking thing moronic yet you've chosen to play victim.......again.

That kind of language is usually blue edited out and I'll thank you not to use it outside of the F**K therad.

I'm not playing the victim. I just pointed out my logic but once again you highlight the one-sidedness of people complaining about the posts of others when they simply ignore the identical bahaviour in others.

If I listened to you guys crying about my defence of the Liberals this entire forum would be nothing but ridens anti-Liberal propaganda with nary a word of criticism coming from you guys crying about me.

[Regina]

Blah, blah, blah.........

[DerbyX]

About the level of debate I expected from you.

[Regina]

And I can't get the bar low enough for you.

[DerbyX]

Right back at you sunshine.

[Brenda]

Come on R, you should edit your post

And write something like: [blue] *this language is not tolerable outside the XXXXthread*[/blue]

[Regina]

[Brenda]

That didn't solve much

[DerbyX]

Brenda wrote:

:lol:
That didn't solve much

Don't worry Bren. The next time the Liberals are criticized we are going to see them bring the hammer down on those people also in a fine display of fairness.

[raydan]

The 24 types of pot-smokers:

http://coedmagazine.com/2009/05/18/the- ... t-smokers/

[Choban]

ASLplease wrote:

I tend to think of a doobie smoker as someone that is slumped forward with droopy shoulders, expressionless face, poor posture, eyes down, jaw slack.......a real slacker with the physiology to prove it.

but thats just my opinion.

Obviously you do not know any pot heads.
I know a lawyer that smokes, very successful person
I also know plenty of others that work as hard or harder than you all day long and when they get home instead of cracking a beer to unwind they blaze a reefer
You have a stereotype in your head that was implanted in our society from the 50's.

[uwish]

I guess my only issue as I said earlier, is what types? do we only allow 'natural' TLC contents and hallucinogens? like pot and mushrooms? Crack is not 'natural' it is manufactured.

who gets to decided, who gets to draw the lines on what is 'natural' content. I must admit, smoking a plant something native in the wild is much different than mainlining a substance that has been chemically enhanced for it's potency.

[Choban]

uwish wrote:

I guess my only issue as I said earlier, is what types? do we only allow 'natural' TLC contents and hallucinogens? like pot and mushrooms? Crack is not 'natural' it is manufactured.

who gets to decided, who gets to draw the lines on what is 'natural' content. I must admit, smoking a plant something native in the wild is much different than mainlining a substance that has been chemically enhanced for it's potency.

I don't think a line needs to be drawn, maijuana and it's products leagal or decriminalized, no other drugs. I don't agree with shrooms or anything else, I mean people could say that cocaine is natural since it comes from a plant too but that's just getting rediculous.