Bruce_the_vii wrote:
Ripcat wrote:
Bruce_the_vii wrote:
Well, infrastructure projects. The problem is they take time to start. They involve lengthy processes. The economy will have improved by the time they get rolling. The Economics 101 text states that governments are not good at creating jobs and certainly not timely jobs in a downturn. There is no known way of how to do it. However union hacks that get paid to write such articles will ignor this basic problem and carry on.
So am I to believe that we have been funding infrastructure projects so well that there aren't hundreds of fully planned projects just waiting on the money to start them?......
I see your point, maybe there is projects ready to go. I don't really know.
I be surprized if there was even one municipality in all of Canada that
didn't have a worthwhile project ready to go.
Most municipalities generally have projects planned out 10 years in advance so they can budget for them as the need arises.
Planned projects can get put off for years because of cost versus priority.
.****************************************************
I asked some tradesmen about getting infrastructure going quickly. They said construction takes some planning but repairs can be done immediately. In Toronto, working from memory, the City's social housing has a $1 billion backlog of repairs, the TTC has a $1 billion of repairs to do and the school board has $100 of millions to do. So, yeah, these could be done in a timely fashion.
I also asked around and people perseive the situation as - they're going to throw money at it. The technical problems of getting people to spend rather than pay off debt or save for a big expenditure make them think the stimulus is not efficient.