CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 405
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:47 pm
 


http://www.calgaryherald.com/opinion/ed ... story.html

Quote:

Ottawa's muzzling of librarians' free speech is intolerable

Ottawa's deliberate muzzling of federal librarians and archivists, a move which comes complete with a new code of conduct, jargon about "high-risk" activities, threats of discipline, and a hotline to rat out miscreants, is truly chilling.

Librarians and archivists would seem to be the most innocuous of souls, so it's hard to imagine what activity they could engage in that would be so "high risk" as to merit this type of censure. These are the folks who give talks at schools, speak at conferences, address groups of amateur genealogy enthusiasts, and publicly discuss the preservation of historic texts, among other educational activities. Yet, according to the new code of conduct, all of these activities - done on the librarians' own time away from work - must now be approved ahead of time by their managers.

The new code covers the gamut of employees at Libraries and Archives Canada - staff, student assistants, workers on contract to the department, and even volunteers. It talks about the obligation of maintaining a "duty of loyalty to the Government of Canada" which extends "beyond our workplace to our personal activities."

One would think that librarians and archivists are at grave risk of selling secrets to Canada's enemies in their spare time, rather than helping to educate their audiences about history.

"Teaching, speaking at conferences, and other personal engagements," the code says, "have been identified as high risk ... with regard to conflict of interest, conflict of duties and duty of loyalty."

The code was assembled by officials at Libraries and Archives Canada, after last April's Values and Ethics Code for federal government employees came into being, mandating that each department establish its own conduct code.

Some of those codes may well be merited in departments where highly sensitive information is handled, but only rampant and absolutely unwarranted paranoia could see a need for it among employees whose job is to preserve and disseminate historic and reference information for the public. Before any LAC employee can accept a speaking engagement, six criteria have to be met - including that the subject matter not be related to LAC. That effectively rules out anyone sharing their knowledge with the general public.

The code appears overly concerned with what an employee might say about the federal government, and even says limited-access blogs may be reason to discipline an employee because such a blog could negate the duty of loyalty to the government.

Most responsible people know there's a tacit understanding that they will not castigate, criticize or otherwise throw their employer into disrepute in a public arena. They understand that they represent their employer even during off-hours and should conduct themselves accordingly. Any concerns about such behaviour should be dealt with on an individual basis. However,

when librarians and archivists give talks about their work, about history or about document preservation, they are educating the public. Speaking at a conference about the role of archivists, for example, cannot by anyone's wildest imagination be construed as disloyal.

This unwarranted dictate severely limiting the librarians' and archivists' freedom of speech is intolerable and must be reversed.

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald



Given that Levant portrays himself as a bold free speech warrior not afraid to speak truth to power, will he step up and protest this travesty?

You'll notice I'm not holding my breath.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17980
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:23 pm
 


Yup, won't be holding my breath.

Actually the standard right-wing response would be that freedom of speech doesn't apply to the employer-employee relationship, adn that employers can make any demands they want of their staff, including what they do or say in their off-hours.





PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:53 pm
 


They have to neuter the PBO. They can't just eliminate it, because they were the ones who created it.

Quote:
In an interview airing Saturday on CBC Radio's The House, the former parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page told host Evan Solomon that the federal government has already begun to undo the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer as Canadians have known it.

The federal government is sending a "very strong signal" that it's "moving to unwind the office," Page said.

According to Page, either one of two scenarios will unfold in the coming months.

Either the federal government builds "a true legislative budget office even with weak legislation," or it hires a tamer successor to "unwind the office so it becomes part of the library business model which is confidential work," Page said.

If it's the latter, Page's advice to a possible successor is "don't take that job."

"Don't unwind five years of hard work… this is an institution that is too important for the country."

Parliamentarians and their staff count on the Library of Parliament for information, reference, and research services but only a selection of their papers are ever made available to the public.

Page fears that under the library model parliamentarians will have less access to the kind of information the PBO has been able to provide over the past five years.


So they'll just prevent any librarian from speaking to the media without scripted responses.


Online
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6061
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:58 pm
 


But still, no hidden agenda....


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17980
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:10 pm
 


Good riddance to the PBO. Guy plays more to the media than anyone else. Him--along with Sheila Fraser--had the easiest jobs oin government--just walk around and crap over everything.





PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:13 pm
 


Zipperfish wrote:
Good riddance to the PBO. Guy plays more to the media than anyone else. Him--along with Sheila Fraser--had the easiest jobs oin government--just walk around and crap over everything.


Yeah, and it looks terrible when his numbers are spot on every time, but they can't figure out what way the wind is blowing right now.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17980
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:25 pm
 


Curtman wrote:
Zipperfish wrote:
Good riddance to the PBO. Guy plays more to the media than anyone else. Him--along with Sheila Fraser--had the easiest jobs oin government--just walk around and crap over everything.


Yeah, and it looks terrible when his numbers are spot on every time, but they can't figure out what way the wind is blowing right now.


Well, I should apply for the job. "Your job is to go to the press and criticize the government. You'll be paid very handsomely and be a media darling. :lol:





PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:51 pm
 


Zipperfish wrote:
Curtman wrote:
Zipperfish wrote:
Good riddance to the PBO. Guy plays more to the media than anyone else. Him--along with Sheila Fraser--had the easiest jobs oin government--just walk around and crap over everything.


Yeah, and it looks terrible when his numbers are spot on every time, but they can't figure out what way the wind is blowing right now.


Well, I should apply for the job. "Your job is to go to the press and criticize the government. You'll be paid very handsomely and be a media darling. :lol:


There you go.. Why even have a budget? Everything is under control.

Imagine a blue backdrop with "Strong Fiscal Management" written across it in a repeating pattern. Maybe an "Action Plan" logo in the bottom right.


Online
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14680
PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:33 am
 


I can't imagine the world where we'd 'need' Ezra Levant.


*shudders*


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18465
PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:42 am
 


DrCaleb wrote:
I can't imagine the world where we'd 'need' Ezra Levant.


*shudders*


SNAP! ROTFL


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.