[Arrowhead]

DrCaleb wrote:

Arrowhead wrote:

This is GREAT! Anyone but Harper!

Like Dion? Iggy? Duceppe?

Think before you write, mmmkay?

I happen to have a different opinion of Dion mmkay? So say hello to Prime Minister Dion next week!

Anyways, if Harper was so great, he wouldn't be facing this non-confidence vote now would he. Neocons will never get it.

[mtbr]

Arrowhead wrote:

DrCaleb wrote:

Arrowhead wrote:

This is GREAT! Anyone but Harper!

Like Dion? Iggy? Duceppe?

Think before you write, mmmkay?

I happen to have a different opinion of Dion mmkay? So say hello to Prime Minister Dion next week!

Anyways, if Harper was so great, he wouldn't be facing this non-confidence vote now would he. Neocons will never get it.

True, Harper underestimated the Liberals, he thought they actually gave a shit about Canada. He didn't realize they were it it just for themselves.

[Jabrwock]

mtbr wrote:

True, Harper underestimated the Liberals, he thought they actually gave a shit about Canada. He didn't realize they were it it just for themselves.

They must be doing something right, or people wouldn't keep voting Liberal/NDP/Bloc. People aren't automatons. Maybe they're voting the way they do to tell the Conservatives something... perhaps Harper should try listening.

[mtbr]

Jabrwock wrote:

mtbr wrote:

True, Harper underestimated the Liberals, he thought they actually gave a shit about Canada. He didn't realize they were it it just for themselves.

They must be doing something right, or people wouldn't keep voting Liberal/NDP/Bloc. People aren't automatons. Maybe they're voting the way they do to tell the Conservatives something... perhaps Harper should try listening.

It will be interesting in the next election when you will be able to vote for the conservatives or the other.

2 choices that's it guess who will win?

[hurley_108]

ziggy wrote:

Jabrwock wrote:

ziggy wrote:

funny but I didnt see the word "coalition" on my ballot.

You didn't see the Conservative coalition party on there?

Progressive-Conservative-Reform coalition, AKA the "new" Conservative party.

I didnt see the ndp and libs as one party on my ballot,maybe my vote means nothing anymore unless it's anything but conservative?

I'm getting pretty pissed at the fact that the coalition see's any votes for the cons as not legit.

The libs lost,suck it up and move on.

Oh please. The Liberals and NDP are still two parties, ad would eb as a coalition government. Just because we've had one-party governments for years doesn't mean we could never have them. Just because the last time we had the opposition granted government was decades ago and it ended badly doesn't mean it couldn't happen again. They didn't change the system so it couldn't happen again.

You're just pissed because the Conservatives blew it. Blew it big time.

[hurley_108]

Jabrwock wrote:

perhaps Harper should try listening.

Harper listen? Unheard of!

[ziggy]

hurley_108 wrote:

You're just pissed because the Conservatives blew it. Blew it big time.

No,i'm pissed because we will probably have another election,how many do we have to have?

This isnt going to do our economy any good either,we were holding our own untill this morning.

[hurley_108]

ziggy wrote:

hurley_108 wrote:

You're just pissed because the Conservatives blew it. Blew it big time.

No,i'm pissed because we will probably have another election,how many do we have to have?

Well then I hope you don't reward Harper for being a douchebag and scuttling his own government.

Quote:

This isnt going to do our economy any good either,we were holding our own untill this morning.

Again, thank Harper for that as he's the one who brought forward a completely incendiary and untenable economic update.

[ziggy]

I dont think I would ever even consider voting liberal again,not after seeing how low they will sink to get back power.

So how many elections should we have? Keep having them untill the libs get in or what?

I'll personally think they will be responsible if our economy suddenly takes a nose dive.

[hurley_108]

ziggy wrote:

I dont think I would ever even consider voting liberal again,not after seeing how low they will sink to get back power.

So how many elections should we have? Keep having them untill the libs get in or what?

I'll personally think they will be responsible if our economy suddenly takes a nose dive.

Yup. Harper's blameless.

[ziggy]

hurley_108 wrote:

ziggy wrote:

I dont think I would ever even consider voting liberal again,not after seeing how low they will sink to get back power.

So how many elections should we have? Keep having them untill the libs get in or what?

I'll personally think they will be responsible if our economy suddenly takes a nose dive.

Yup. Harper's blameless.

You think he's to blame for the drop in the stock market today?

Not him trying to derail any investors confidence in our country.
We were holding our own untill today.

[DrCaleb]

Arrowhead wrote:

DrCaleb wrote:

Arrowhead wrote:

This is GREAT! Anyone but Harper!

Like Dion? Iggy? Duceppe?

Think before you write, mmmkay?

I happen to have a different opinion of Dion mmkay? So say hello to Prime Minister Dion next week!

Anyways, if Harper was so great, he wouldn't be facing this non-confidence vote now would he. Neocons will never get it.

I like Dion as a person. As a PM - no way, Hosé. The others even less so. I'd like to propose a vote of non-confidence on the whole kindergarten class, on behalf of all Canadians.

It's been a long time since we had a PM who cared more for Canada than for the party or for themselves. (If we ever have).

All I'm saying is, calling for anyone but {evil} can result in getting {different brand of evil}.

[ziggy]

Dr. C says

Quote:

It's been a long time since we had a PM who cared more for Canada than for the party or for themselves. (If we ever have).

How about Joe who?

[Jabrwock]

Saxon wrote:

They should be hung as the traitors they clearly are.... Is EVERYONE on this bloody site a commie-pinko libtard squeek?

Oh look, the Neo-Cons have come out to play. Give Reagan my regards.

ziggy wrote:

not after seeing how low they will sink to get back power

I'm not very impressed with how low the Cons were sinking in order to keep in power, either... and they wonder why turnout was so low. People are sick of playing.

[uwish]

if you want to see a pole a little more representative of the population, check out the results of the CTVnews.ca pole.

75% agree the coalition is just a power grab