Author | Topic Options |
---|---|
The issue that "no party has even garnered 60% in an election" is moot, because electoral reform should not be a party issue. It should be non- or multi-partisan.<br />
<br />
About 15 years ago, New Zealand conducted two referenda on electoral reform. Both passed, and MMP was chosen.<br />
<br />
The first referendum had one simple question: "Do you want the electoral system changed - YES or NO?" It passed with a simple majority - which was the requirement set beforehand. This then meant that the NZ Government was committed to conduct the second referendum.<br />
<br />
The second referendum presented the voters with some options to be selected: MMP, STV and a few others. While the NZ Government tried very hard to sidetrack the referendum, even setting up a mock organization, the simple majority selected MMP and this was then instituted.<br />
<br />
I guess this would be the only logical process. Requiring a 60% approval rate (as was also done in BC) is too high and patently unfair.<br />
Jacob |
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 4 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |