Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Methinks he doth protest too much. He's obivously got a chip on his shoulder about the whole thing.
As an ex-muslim he has a standing death sentence against him for apostasy in any muslim country. That would tend to focus one's thoughts I should think.
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I believe the fundamental flaw of teh Nazis was they were INTOLERANT of Jews, not that they were too tolerant.
So outside of the whole "kill all the Jews thing" the Nazis were okay?
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
The guy is practially egging on a Holocaust for Muslims and want's to tell me I'm a Nazi if I don't play along with him. Hilarious. Still, it's obvious from this guy's screed that he and historical knowledge are mutually exclusive realms.
As an ex-muslim he knows the subject better than you do.
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
And the bit that "we must establish a way to measure evil." My Wingnut Alarm was certainly going off after that line. It's like--of course, haven't you heard of the EVILOMETER. It measures Evil at twenty paces.
Then you're logically making his point for him. You are not capable of defining evil.
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
There's a bunch of Muslims in my neighbourhood, and we get along just fine. We go to Starbucks together, play soccer, their kids play with my kids. I can't believe there are guys like that out there who would come and round these fine, kind children up for being Evil, at least according to his little Evilometer.
Yet there are. They round up these little kids, send them to the madrasas and thence from there they go off on murderous and suicidal jihad.
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
The writer thinks I am complacent, an appeaser. If he--or anyonen else--ever comes to my neighbourhood park to round up the kids, he'll find I'm neither.
With what means and with what skill would you stand against such a thing?