[Newsbot]

Title: Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis
Category: Environmental
Posted By: Freakinoldguy
Date: 2017-06-03 12:44:26
Canadian

[Freakinoldguy]

This comment scares the crap out of me and goes to show that even if climate change is real these assholes couldn't care less about it and are just using it for their social engineering projects.

$1:

"One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole," said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.

So what is the goal of environmental policy?

"We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy," said Edenhofer.

Just another in a long line of social justice warriors from the UN who should be taken out and terminated.

[N_Fiddledog]

The rest is good too:

$1:

For those who want to believe that maybe Edenhofer just misspoke and doesn't really mean that, consider that a little more than five years ago he also said that "the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world's resources will be negotiated."

Mad as they are, Edenhofer's comments are nevertheless consistent with other alarmists who have spilled the movement's dirty secret. Last year, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, made a similar statement.

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution," she said in anticipation of last year's Paris climate summit.

"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history."

The plan is to allow Third World countries to emit as much carbon dioxide as they wish -- because, as Edenhofer said, "in order to get rich one has to burn coal, oil or gas" -- while at the same time restricting emissions in advanced nations. This will, of course, choke economic growth in developed nations, but they deserve that fate as they "have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community," he said. The fanaticism runs so deep that one professor has even suggested that we need to plunge ourselves into a depression to fight global warming.

Perhaps Naomi Klein summed up best what the warming the fuss is all about in her book "This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate."

"What if global warming isn't only a crisis?" Klein asks in a preview of a documentary inspired by her book. "What if it's the best chance we're ever going to get to build a better world?"

In her mind, the world has to "change, or be changed" because an "economic system" -- meaning free-market capitalism -- has caused environmental "wreckage."

This is how the global warming alarmist community thinks. It wants to frighten, intimidate and then assume command. It needs a "crisis" to take advantage of, a hobgoblin to menace the people, so that they will beg for protection from the imaginary threat. The alarmists' "better world" is one in which they rule a global welfare state. They've admitted this themselves.

[Sunnyways]

Some people are going to watch catastrophic flooding in our cities and deny it has anything to do with climate change.

[N_Fiddledog]

What catastrophic flooding? Show us evidence of flooding we've never seen before.

[Tricks]

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

Some people are going to watch catastrophic flooding in our cities and deny it has anything to do with climate change.

Of course, it's god's will because gays.

[PluggyRug]

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

Some people are going to watch catastrophic flooding in our cities and deny it has anything to do with climate change.

Walt Disney movies are more real then the alarmists propaganda.

[N_Fiddledog]

PluggyRug PluggyRug:

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

Some people are going to watch catastrophic flooding in our cities and deny it has anything to do with climate change.

Walt Disney movies are more real then the alarmists propaganda.

Or as MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen says Believing CO2 controls the climate ‘is pretty close to believing in magic’

http://merionwest.com/2017/04/25/richar ... te-change/

[BRAH]

Tricks Tricks:

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

Some people are going to watch catastrophic flooding in our cities and deny it has anything to do with climate change.

Of course, it's god's will because gays.

[Tricks]

BRAH BRAH:

Tricks Tricks:

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

Some people are going to watch catastrophic flooding in our cities and deny it has anything to do with climate change.

Of course, it's god's will because gays.

Sorry, sin. Close enough.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/what-the-bib ... te-change/

[N_Fiddledog]

The Pope is on board with the globalist, progressive, pseudo science version of the anthropogenic, global warming catastrophe hypothesis.

He can tell you about the great flood, but even he can't show us these special, catastrophic floods of today that Sunnyways thinks will come rushing through the doors of global warming unbelievers.

[BeaverFever]

So to recap, another right wing OPINION piece posted in the news section, offering up a standard fare right wing nut job diatribe, refreshed with a couple of cherry-picked sentences from someone's recent comments to make it seem like something new.

Climate denialism theory desperately horribly fails to establish motive behind a supposed climate change conspiracy. You can't get ten people in a room to agree on toppings for a pizza yet we are to believe that millions of people around the world, from heads of state to captains of industry to lowly unpaid student researchers, are all participants in a highly orchestrated and elaborate global conspiracy that doesn't directly benefit any of them and will in fact ruin their own lives, just for the heck of it. And they're spending billions of dollars of their own money to do it.

That far-fetched batshit theory is a lot less plausible than the reality, which is simply that climate change is real and that polluters who currently profit from pollution fund climate denialism in order to protect their profits.

[N_Fiddledog]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

So to recap, another right wing OPINION piece posted in the mews section

And maybe you'd have a legitimate critique there if there weren't so many Left wing OPINION pieces posted in the 'news' section requiring an equitable response.

As to the rest of your spewfest of slurs it's not worth a response.

[PluggyRug]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

So to recap, another right wing OPINION piece posted in the mews section, offering up a standard fare right wing nut job diatribe, refreshed with a couple of cherry-picked sentences from someone's recent comments to make it seem like something new.

Climate denialism theory desperately horribly fails to establish motive behind a supposed climate change conspiracy. You can't get ten people in a room to agree on toppings for a pizza yet we are to believe that millions of people around the world, from heads of state to captains of industry to lowly unpaid student researchers, are all participants in a highly orchestrated and elaborate global conspiracy that doesn't directly benefit any of them and will in fact ruin their own lives, just for the heck of it. And they're spending billions of dollars of their own money to fo it.

That far-fetched batshit theory id a lot less plausible than the reality, which is simply that climate change is real and that polluters who currently profit from pollution fund climate denialism in order to protect their profits.

You forgot to add the tags [dumbrant] [/dumbrant] to your post.

[Freakinoldguy]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

So to recap, another right wing OPINION piece posted in the mews section, offering up a standard fare right wing nut job diatribe, refreshed with a couple of cherry-picked sentences from someone's recent comments to make it seem like something new.

Climate denialism theory desperately horribly fails to establish motive behind a supposed climate change conspiracy. You can't get ten people in a room to agree on toppings for a pizza yet we are to believe that millions of people around the world, from heads of state to captains of industry to lowly unpaid student researchers, are all participants in a highly orchestrated and elaborate global conspiracy that doesn't directly benefit any of them and will in fact ruin their own lives, just for the heck of it. And they're spending billions of dollars of their own money to fo it.

That far-fetched batshit theory id a lot less plausible than the reality, which is simply that climate change is real and that polluters who currently profit from pollution fund climate denialism in order to protect their profits.

I'm not here to debate whether climate change is man made or even exists, what I'm here to do is point out that no matter the truth it's being abused by people like Edenhofer to "redistribute" other peoples wealth in a manner that is immoral and likely illegal.

So, I'd like to know if you're claiming Edenhofer never said those things and never made that claim about wealth redistribution or, are you claiming that the quotes are made up by some editorial writer at the Investors Business Daily?

But, before you answer I'd like you to read this because it seems to confirm Edenhofer's alleged allegations about the real reason Climate Change is now being pushed so hard.

$1:

How Climate Alarmism Advances International Political Agendas:

A remark from Maurice Strong, who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.”

Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S undersecretary of state for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed:“We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.

Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick, who then headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department said:

$1:

“A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”

In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment, told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

Speaking at the 2000 U.N. Conference on Climate Change in the Hague, former President Jacques Chirac of France explained why the IPCC’s climate initiative supported a key Western European Kyoto Protocol objective: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/ ... 3d4f568a37

Of course, since it's an editorial Mr. Bell might just be another hack with an opinion who used fabricated quotes on a faux news source like Forbes to further an agenda his anti global warming agenda.