lynnefoster wrote:
You have to be brain-dead to suspect Briere.
The guy didn't even have time to dump the bodies without a car.
You can prove this of course right? You can post a graph of his home and the dump sites along with a TTC schedule showing it was impossible right?
You have no evidence do you? You keep demanding everybody else post concrete evidence but you yourself post only opinion.
Its your opinion he did not have time but you have no evidence. Its actually quite clear he did have time if you examine the time line.
You claim he would have had to take the day off work yet his coworkers reported that on the day in question after the murder he was white as a ghost and obviously bothered by something.
Throughout all this you still cannot account for the fact his DNA was found under the fingernails of Holly other then to simply dismiss it because it was printed in a newspaper, the same paper you obtained all your info.
You claim the police aren't releasing info regarding the bags but why would they? They routinely withhold information in order to distinguish genuine participants in the crime from fakers. They released all the pertinent info that led to his confession.
Of course you won't touch the fact that he has never recanted his confession nor provided a detailed explanation in court along with details not released to the public (ie you). In the genuine cases of wrongfully convicted people they maintained innocence throughout the ordeal. In addition DNA evidence
is almost universally used to exonerate them not convict them. For all you talk about not convicting people on suspicion you think its OK to convict US politicians based entirely on your suspicion and to exonerate people based entirely on the retarded theory that they look innocent.
The only thing lower then your credibility would apparently be your IQ.
Forum Elite 
![[cheer]](./images/smilies/icon_cheers.gif "Cheer"){kind=icon}
?
)
