CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30561
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:13 pm
 


Title: Canada scores 2nd last on energy efficiency study
Category: Business
Posted By: ShepherdsDog
Date: 2012-07-16 18:07:53
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:13 pm
 


We're only just ahead of Russia


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21663
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 10:36 pm
 


Necessity is the mother of not only invention, but also efficiency. There is no need to be efficinet if you have a surfiet of the good in question.

Ever see a kid on Halloween? The first night they pig out. All the good stuff too. The Snickers, the Kit Kats. By the end of day five they're trying to make the last few sour candies last as long as they can.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2398
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:18 am
 


Hmmmm, the countries at the top of the list are geographically small. The countries at the bottom are the largest in size. Coincidence? Plus are you really going to trust any numbers coming out of China?


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
Profile
Posts: 32460
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:47 am
 


Too many variables to consider like geography, climate and size, then they throw in GDP?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:26 am
 


Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Necessity is the mother of not only invention, but also efficiency. There is no need to be efficinet if you have a surfiet of the good in question.

Ever see a kid on Halloween? The first night they pig out. All the good stuff too. The Snickers, the Kit Kats. By the end of day five they're trying to make the last few sour candies last as long as they can.

The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility in practise. Then, watching US tv this morning I see this commercial: http://www.americaspower.org/now-is-the-time. I'm not sure which emoticon to use :roll: or. ROTFL .


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23041
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:30 am
 


QBall QBall:
Hmmmm, the countries at the top of the list are geographically small. The countries at the bottom are the largest in size. Coincidence? Plus are you really going to trust any numbers coming out of China?


Let's not forget that the countries with the harshest winters are also at the bottom - I'm sure the long, cold winters makes a big difference in energy efficiency/consumption.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:35 am
 


QBall QBall:
Plus are you really going to trust any numbers coming out of China?


Good point. [B-o]


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2366
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:57 pm
 


Without a deeper look at the methodology used to rank the nations, it's hard to make any informed conclusions.

So all you have is a sensational headline.


Offline
Newbie
Newbie
Profile
Posts: 3
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:06 pm
 


You should read the report itself. They use some good metrics (efficiency), but bulk them out with other useless and even misleading numbers and then add it all up. It brings up some interesting questions, but mostly about how NOT write a report. The final grade is next to useless.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 51124
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:38 pm
 


AdamF AdamF:
It brings up some interesting questions, but mostly about how NOT write a report. The final grade is next to useless.


But Greenpeace was still quick to denounce the Alberta Tarsands.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 3:02 pm
 


Greenpeace hates humanity in general so I don't really care much what they have to say.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:11 pm
 


That's not true, Bart. Greenpeace is well intentioned, it's just that they're a bunch of unqualified boobs playing like they know what the fuck they're talking about. They're Sean Penn or PETA types...their cause is legitimate, they just don't realize that their foolish and sensational actions piss people off and, hence, detract from serious, qualified efforts to make the world a better place. That's what happens when hippies and people with silver spoons up their asses take up causes in which they have no experience nor vested interest.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21663
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:16 am
 


Lemmy Lemmy:
That's not true, Bart. Greenpeace is well intentioned, it's just that they're a bunch of unqualified boobs playing like they know what the fuck they're talking about. They're Sean Penn or PETA types...their cause is legitimate, they just don't realize that their foolish and sensational actions piss people off and, hence, detract from serious, qualified efforts to make the world a better place. That's what happens when hippies and people with silver spoons up their asses take up causes in which they have no experience nor vested interest.


Yeah, I'd go with this. The Pembina Institute are smart guys. The Mining Watch--sharp cookies. The various envionmentla law associations. But Greenpeace and the David Suzuki Foundation are basically "marketers" of their cause. As anyone who has worked at a company with a marketing department, the marketing guys don't usually understand their product. Their expertise is the social interface.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.