SigPig wrote:
I see this as an important step. It at least puts something in place that stops the Senate from stagnating and full of senile old geezers like it is now.
One amendment I would suggest, though I am not sure how it could be initiated would be to have the senate on a rotation where, say 1/3 of the members are rotated every 8 years. And if the Senate is kept at full capacity, then the remaining 2/3 could keep it functioning while the others are replaced. Then eventually you just introduce elections for this 1/3 turnover.
That would be another good alternative.
CKA Super Elite 
