DrCaleb DrCaleb:
And that's where we come to a screeching halt. It is the governments business to make sure everyone is treated equally in the public space.
In public spaces, yes. Like schools, government buildings, parks, roads, etc.
But it how does the government justify expropriating control of a privately owned, privately funded property/business and then dictating who has access to it?
I'd rather let the public decide on this.
See, in some ways they already have.
Because if I'm in New York City and I want to go somewhere where I can be comfy in the company of upper class white people all I have to do is pay for the privilege.
Check out
Le Bernadin.
https://nymag.com/restaurants/reviews/l ... n-2011-12/Want to keep them swarthy types away while preening yourself as a progressive social liberal? Just pay for the privilege and you're good!
$1:
The four-course prix fixe dinner at Le Bernardin costs $157, and the chef's tasting menu goes for $225. At lunch, the three-course meal is $88.
Or should the government force
Le Bernadin to provide meals to low income poor people who will drive away the upper class clientele with their boorish behavior and dearth of sartorial splendor?
Why is this any different than telling a white owned BBQ shop in South Carolina that they have to serve people they don't want to serve?
Should they just jack up their prices to accomplish the same discrimination that
Le Bernadin gets away with because it's a favorite with rich, white liberal Democrats?
How does that square with the mantra of...
$1:
It is the governments business to make sure everyone is treated equally in the public space.
Seems to me the government is awfully selective about that equality of yours.
Myself, I'd rather them not get involved at all because doing so violates property rights and it also violates the First Amendment clause on Freedom of Association.
See, Freedom of Association is necessarily
the freedom to discriminate.
Ironic thing is that the Democrats are so against this notion that their party is right now being hijacked by a non-Democrat named Bernie Sanders.
The GOP has no such problem because it aggressively asserts their freedom of association whenever it has been challenged.
Like I've long said, I prefer to err on the side of freedom and liberty...warts and all.