CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 16802
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:49 pm
 


Title: Greyhound bus killer will be locked up a long time: mental illness expert
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: hurley_108
Date: 2009-03-06 12:10:41
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 22826
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:49 pm
 


He should have been put in an institute when he was diagnosed back in 2004.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4048
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:21 pm
 


Pardon me if I don't take Ms. Osted's word for it...


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6452
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:30 pm
 


ridenrain wrote:
He should have been put in an institute when he was diagnosed back in 2004.


You can't put every person in an institute because they have a mental illness. 1 fourth of the population would be institutionalized :o


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13354
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:35 pm
 


Proculation wrote:
ridenrain wrote:
He should have been put in an institute when he was diagnosed back in 2004.


You can't put every person in an institute because they have a mental illness. 1 fourth of the population would be institutionalized :o



R=UP


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 44542
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:37 pm
 


Huh, I wonder which 25% of CKA we would be locking up, and who would be taking care of them :D


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15610
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:41 pm
 


Brenda wrote:
Huh, I wonder which 25% of CKA we would be locking up, and who would be taking care of them :D

Me guessing the % of CKA may be a bit higher than that. 8O


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Edmonton Oilers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8561
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20757
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:45 pm
 


hurley_108 wrote:


What a surprise. Canada isn't going to hell in a hand basket under the guidance of the liberal moral relativist judges. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18779
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:49 pm
 


Well obviously.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1778
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:08 pm
 


DerbyX wrote:


And yet if you search the entire forum your post is the only one with the term "liberal moral relativist" in relation to any of these stories so it makes you wonder who gave you that idea. I find it ironic that many of the examples given are what they are because of 'conservative' pushes for more severe sentencing.




Akh


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20757
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:18 pm
 


Akhenaten wrote:

And yet if you search the entire forum your post is the only one with the term "liberal moral relativist" in relation to any of these stories so it makes you wonder who gave you that idea. I find it ironic that many of the examples given are what they are because of 'conservative' pushes for more severe sentencing.


Actually sunshine since you are a noob I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just gently correct you.

The liberal moral crack was an obvious plug about the legal drug thread.

The comments about liberal judges though is one that has been a commonality on this forum by the conservative pundits. Every time somebody receives a sentence less then they like they inevitably decry the "Liberal appointed judges" and in general blame them for any number of crimes in society as if they wouldn't exist if our justice system were filled with good ole boys sending kids to the gallows by the bushel.

Thats why when it turns out those very same Liberal appointed judges are making good decisions and our society isn't crumbling I point that out.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13354
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1778
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:41 pm
 


DerbyX wrote:
Akhenaten wrote:

And yet if you search the entire forum your post is the only one with the term "liberal moral relativist" in relation to any of these stories so it makes you wonder who gave you that idea. I find it ironic that many of the examples given are what they are because of 'conservative' pushes for more severe sentencing.


Actually sunshine since you are a noob I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just gently correct you.



Yep not a post can be made by you guys that isn't a childish personal insult. Even in response to a harmless post like mine. I stopped reading at this point. I hate to say this I really do, but chose just about any American/international forum out there and they all sound more mature that the posts that have been replied to mine in the 48 hours I've been here. And just as I predicted as a moderate I will get insulted by both sides. I've been called a Leftist and implied I'm a Bushbot for the most simple and polite of replies....mostly because that's what peopel do when they can't handle a simple point.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20757
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:45 pm
 


Akhenaten wrote:
DerbyX wrote:
Akhenaten wrote:

And yet if you search the entire forum your post is the only one with the term "liberal moral relativist" in relation to any of these stories so it makes you wonder who gave you that idea. I find it ironic that many of the examples given are what they are because of 'conservative' pushes for more severe sentencing.


Actually sunshine since you are a noob I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just gently correct you.



Yep not a post can be made by you guys that isn't a childish personal insult. Even in response to a harmless post like mine. I stopped reading at this point.


I read your stuff and it was all about insults (that and changing your posts after the fact).

Go back and finish reading. I explain why you were wrong.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5 ... 10  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GRUMPY1 and 3 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.