CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Newbie
Newbie
 Boston Bruins
Profile
Posts: 11
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:49 pm
 


Hope they gave the Tiger something to settle it's upset stomach after tasting the human. It may not have liked the flavour of the human. :D


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Carolina Hurricans
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5107
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:45 pm
 


It said in the article that he called a female security guard that worked there that he knew. Me thinks he was planning on getting frisked but got grabbed by the wrong pussy. :lol:


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 277
PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:10 am
 


I read in another article he was common-law with the security guard.

There was a good article that gave a little recent history of the vandalism and B&E's at the Calgary Zoo. The article stated, that for the protection of the animals only, they should make higher fences and seriously look at their ineffective security.

I totally agreed with the article. It was said there were 4 security guards on that night and not one of them knew of the mauling until the guy (or idiot if you wish) made the phone call.

Question is, if the person who was mauled is common law or married to the female security guard, should she be (or can she be) dismissed for his stupid stunt?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:59 am
 


$1:
Question is, if the person who was mauled is common law or married to the female security guard, should she be (or can she be) dismissed for his stupid stunt?

imo, only if she knew about it. That would make her an accomplice (sp?)
But if she didn't, than she can't. You are never responsible for the actions of your spouse, unless you knew and didn't do anything about it.

If your partner kills your mother, out of the blue, would you go to jail?


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14709
PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:49 am
 


BionicBunny BionicBunny:
There was a good article that gave a little recent history of the vandalism and B&E's at the Calgary Zoo. The article stated, that for the protection of the animals only, they should make higher fences and seriously look at their ineffective security.

Why would people break into a zoo anyway? To steal animals to keep in their own backyards? Really...what is there to steal? Rocks? Hay? Even if you're against animals in captivity vandalizing the zoo is a pretty stupid way of making your point.

Rather ironic isn't it that they propose higher fences to keep humans out to protect creatures that could kill a person with one quick swipe? Who is more dangerous...us or them?


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 24
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:02 pm
 


Shamefully, Ontario has more inhumane and unsafe zoos than any other province and anyone can keep a tiger as a pet. The World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) is asking the Ontario government to pass regulations now. EDIT BY MOD


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:05 pm
 


admirable spam is still spam. :)


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.