No that's a bad analogy. That's not what I'm saying at all.
What I'm saying is there are parks. There are laws governing standards that protect the convenience of the many. Don't change those laws unless you can show the common sense of that law no longer makes sense.
You mentioned the North Carolina law.
As I understand it the city of Charlotte wanted to change it's law to allow biological men to use women's washrooms. The state passed a law forbidding such municipal law changes. The state, as was their right, chose to maintain the status quo, and protect the rights of the many over the pouts of the few.
This one's from a newspaper that seems to favor the Progressive agenda. So it's fair.
$1:
Transgender people who have not taken surgical and legal steps to change the gender noted on their birth certificates have no legal right under state law to use public restrooms of the gender with which they identify. Cities and counties no longer can establish a different standard. Critics of the Charlotte ordinance cite privacy concerns and say it was “social engineering” to allow people born as biological males to enter women’s restrooms.
Read more here:
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/p ... rylink=cpy