hurley_108 wrote:
ridenrain wrote:
If I remember correctly, that bill just some bullshit way to sneak in some more anti-hunting moves?
That's why it was killed.
Right.

Bill C-15B also legitimized third party legal actions, which raised the specter of well-funded animal rights groups taking anglers, hunters, trappers, and farmers to court. The possibility of that happening was enough to catalyze opposition to Bill C-15B. The next iteration was Bill C-20, a better bill, but it died on the order paper with the calling of the 2006 general election.