[ShepherdsDog]

Maybe the general populace will now turn their rage on those who support the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

[xerxes]

It would sense (well, a little bit more) if the people were under the impression that the Pakistani government was behind the attack and not Al-Qaeda.

[Guest]

If you look at who has something to gain from this, it wouldn't be Al-Q, they have the most to lose. The frontier of Pakistan was the last safe haven in the world that Al-Q has. In other words you don't shit where you eat.

[JustKate]

Anonymous Anonymous:

If you look at who has something to gain from this, it wouldn't be Al-Q, they have the most to lose. The frontier of Pakistan was the last safe haven in the world that Al-Q has. In other words you don't shit where you eat.

Pakistan is mostly ruled by warlords. These warlords have the same ideology as the Taliban and Al-Q, that's why they support them. Creating chaos before the countries election will throw the country into instability. A dream come true for these groups who want to take over Pakistan (a nuclear country).

Think about it that way.

[sasquatch2]

Anonymous wrote:

$1:

If you look at who has something to gain from this, it wouldn't be Al-Q, they have the most to lose. The frontier of Pakistan was the last safe haven in the world that Al-Q has. In other words you don't shit where you eat.

Perhaps take your own advice and register.

[stemmer]

Now we know why Canada, US and it's allies must stay in Afghanistan and Iraq....