stratos stratos:
$1:
Err, actually that ice would lead to 3 feet of sea rise, meaning 1,300 square miles of coastline is lost forever.
I know what you're getting at. Kind of like lost cost line when the Ice age ended. More polar ice = less ocean water = more land mass / cost line
$1:
And the land under the glacier would still remain unusable tundra,
Not arguing per say just wondering why it can not be used for something?
Antarctica would still be incredibly cold for almost the entire year, and never receives a lot of light. So if the glaciers were to completely melt away they would just reveal scrub land. Like far northern Canada. It would take eons for the soil to change from rocky to something you can farm on as well.
Basically Antarctica doesn't have to warm up a lot for the glaciers to fall apart, and it still leaves the land as a frozen wasteland.