He does not have his old man's moxy. Pierre would never have used such a euphemism.
Freakinoldguy
CKA Elite
Posts: 4598
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:01 pm
Potty mouthed twit should understand that language like that is only effective if you have the testicular fortitude to back it up, which, given his lame apology he obviously doesn't.
Otherwise, it's just another ineffective slur that shows a definate lack of respect for the office he holds.
Mr_Canada
CKA Uber
Posts: 11539
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:02 pm
Mangez de la merde?
EyeBrock
CKA Uber
Posts: 14762
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:05 pm
Uncouth behaviour in the House of Commons. Who would have thought!?
DanSC
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2238
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:23 pm
Looks like we don't have to annex Canada after all. Canadians are evolving into Americans in the highest halls of power.
EyeBrock
CKA Uber
Posts: 14762
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:27 pm
Parliament in Canada or any other Westminister style assembly has always been a bit rough. The distance between opposing sides of the House has traditionally been in excess of the length of two drawn swords.
Parliament in Canada or any other Westminister style assembly has always been a bit rough. The distance between opposing sides of the House has traditionally been in excess of the length of two drawn swords.
Yes, but we should at least try to keep it civilized in this hemisphere.
EyeBrock
CKA Uber
Posts: 14762
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:08 pm
That's from the Canadian parliament website. Canada has a long history of tempestuous sittings.
Gunnair
CKA Uber
Posts: 13847
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:35 pm
DanSC wrote:
EyeBrock wrote:
Parliament in Canada or any other Westminister style assembly has always been a bit rough. The distance between opposing sides of the House has traditionally been in excess of the length of two drawn swords.