[BeaverFever]

Awwe. Exaggerating crybaby right wing hypocrite can't even take a teaspoon of what he dishes out daily with a shovel. Typical chickenhawk pussy.

You Deplorables and the neo-nazis you're so desperate to defend worship at the of hate and violence daily. Now you want sympathy because one of you ran a woman over with a car and now people are speaking unkindly about you. Cry me a fucking river you hypocritical pissy little bitch.

[BeaverFever]

Awwe. Exaggerating crybaby right wing hypocrite can't even take a teaspoon of what he dishes out daily with a shovel. Typical chickenhawk pussy.

You Deplorables and the neo-nazis you're so desperate to defend worship at the of hate and violence daily. Now you want sympathy because one of you ran a woman over with a car and now people are speaking unkindly about you. Cry me a fucking river you hypocritical pissy little bitch.

[martin14]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Awwe. Exaggerating crybaby right wing hypocrite can't even take a teaspoon of what he dishes out daily with a shovel. Typical chickenhawk pussy.

You Deplorables and the neo-nazis you're so desperate to defend worship at the of hate and violence daily. Now you want sympathy because one of you ran a woman over with a car and now people are speaking unkindly about you. Cry me a fucking river you hypocritical pissy little bitch.

Learn how to post, you angry whiny bitch. Double posting is a sign of inbred stupidity.
And I'm not looking for sympathy, I can take care of myself just fine.

[DrCaleb]

martin14 martin14:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

martin14 martin14:

Now, who else liked burning people ?

You have completely lost the plot.

Not at all. The hysterical alt-left is now completely out of control, and it is they who have 'lost the plot'.

Equating a dick holding a spray can to the Holocaust is 'losing the plot'.

martin14 martin14:

Trump gonna war !
Militia gonna shoot !

Neil was simply re-iterating Trumps own tweets, and showed an actual picture of actual 'militia' armed and armored, and somehow you think that is equivalent to the left throwing rocks? That is 'losing the plot'.

martin14 martin14:

Anyone who is slightly left of Mao, or even tries to voice a complaint
that antifa might be the tiniest bit rough, can now be expected to be
dog piled and called Nazi on a constant basis. And I'm not putting up with it.

So why not condemn the right for their violence as well? The alt-right are the ones marching with torches and spears - are the left supposed to pull a Ghandi and just let themselves be beaten? Seeing one side's violence as acceptable while the other is not is 'losing the plot'.

[BartSimpson]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

Equating a dick holding a spray can to the Holocaust is 'losing the plot'.

In this case it isn't.

The language of the left is amping up the call for violence and like our resident loser PD they think it's just fine to attack people they don't like but then they'll run screaming about the injustice when, like the assholes in the street attacking cars in Charlottesville, they get hurt due to their own arrogance and stupidity.

Oh, yeah...more video came out yesterday on the event in Charlottesville and one of the legal people on a Sacramento TV station (that's decidedly liberal) said it's time to step back from trying the driver in public. He says based upon the people attacking multiple vehicles both before and after the one dumbshit got killed he expects the driver to easily beat the 'hit and run' charge and that once the hit and run is put aside then the manslaughter/murder charge falls apart.

The video shows the man was not accelerating until his car was attacked.

There was no prememditation because there's no way the driver would have known that the leftists had spontaneously blocked the street just seconds before. So there goes the murder charge.

He hit the brakes when he saw people and traffic ahead of him...and his intent then vacating the manslaughter charge.

The woman he hit and killed was BEHIND his car trying to attack it when he panicked and backed up.

Based upon the fact that the leftists have attacked drivers at other blockades in the past then the very compelling argument can be made that the driver was in fear for his life and safety.

And what choice did he have given that the mayor and governor - both Democrats - had ordered law enforcement to stand down and to allow the leftists to attack the legal protestors.

And that's the case the defense will present.

[martin14]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

So why not condemn the right for their violence as well? The alt-right are the ones marching with torches and spears - are the left supposed to pull a Ghandi and just let themselves be beaten? Seeing one side's violence as acceptable while the other is not is 'losing the plot'.

I'll condemn the pandering Dummycrat chickenshit left wing mayors who seem to always tell
their police to move away, and let the violence happen.

[DrCaleb]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

Equating a dick holding a spray can to the Holocaust is 'losing the plot'.

In this case it isn't.

The language of the left is amping up the call for violence and like our resident loser PD they think it's just fine to attack people they don't like but then they'll run screaming about the injustice when, like the assholes in the street attacking cars in Charlottesville, they get hurt due to their own arrogance and stupidity.

And it's the escalating actions of the right that are causing the left to escalate to match. I've always written that violence begets only violence. Which came first, the Fascists or the anti-fascists? Words never hurt anyone but delicate Nancy boys.

[DrCaleb]

martin14 martin14:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

So why not condemn the right for their violence as well? The alt-right are the ones marching with torches and spears - are the left supposed to pull a Ghandi and just let themselves be beaten? Seeing one side's violence as acceptable while the other is not is 'losing the plot'.

I'll condemn the pandering Dummycrat chickenshit left wing mayors who seem to always tell
their police to move away, and let the violence happen.

But bringing the torches and spears in the first place is fine? = "losing the plot"

[xerxes]

Blah blah blah. Same old blame the victim horseshit from the deranged right.

[BartSimpson]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

Equating a dick holding a spray can to the Holocaust is 'losing the plot'.

In this case it isn't.

The language of the left is amping up the call for violence and like our resident loser PD they think it's just fine to attack people they don't like but then they'll run screaming about the injustice when, like the assholes in the street attacking cars in Charlottesville, they get hurt due to their own arrogance and stupidity.

And it's the escalating actions of the right that are causing the left to escalate to match. I've always written that violence begets only violence. Which came first, the Fascists or the anti-fascists? Words never hurt anyone but delicate Nancy boys.

Cause always precedes effect.

Tearing down monuments that are important to Southerners is an utterly unnecessary provocation that put the fascists in the streets (they are not right wingers) along with a coalition of other groups who want to preserve Southern heritage...and that includes a growing number of black people, too.

The fascists had a permit to march and they were acting within their rights. The left showed up to try to deprive them of those rights.

And right there any sympathy I may have had for the leftists vaporized.

Anymore they're nothing but bullies who want to intimidate anyone they don't like into silence. I fucking LOATHE bullies and anyone who employs bullying tactics is to me someone deserving of a brutal and merciless beat down. I don't give a fuck if the bully is a fascist, a Nazi, a communist, a Democrat, a Muslim, a Christian whackjob, or one of those fucked up radical orthodox Jews: I hate them all and would be thrilled to give them all the choice of renouncing their bullshit or jumping into a woodchipper.

But that won't happen.

What will happen next is that the repercussions will include statues of MalcomX, Martin Luther King, and etc, being torn down in the middle of the night in retaliation for the needless destruction of Confederate monuments.

And have you noticed the timing on this horseshit?

The statues are suddenly the most important thing to the left and the Democrats because their limpdicked Russia narrative is finally impoding and because their hatred at Trump's handling of North Korea came off looking pathetic when North Korea backed down and didn't fire their missiles at Guam this week.

So they had to move the topic to the next thing in their playbook and that was Confederate/Southern heritage.

What'll it be next?

[DrCaleb]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

In this case it isn't.

The language of the left is amping up the call for violence and like our resident loser PD they think it's just fine to attack people they don't like but then they'll run screaming about the injustice when, like the assholes in the street attacking cars in Charlottesville, they get hurt due to their own arrogance and stupidity.

And it's the escalating actions of the right that are causing the left to escalate to match. I've always written that violence begets only violence. Which came first, the Fascists or the anti-fascists? Words never hurt anyone but delicate Nancy boys.

Cause always precedes effect.

Exactly. Which is why the Fascists begat the anti-Fascists. Without one, there wouldn't be the other.

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Tearing down monuments that are important to Southerners is an utterly unnecessary provocation that put the fascists in the streets (they are not right wingers) along with a coalition of other groups who want to preserve Southern heritage...and that includes a growing number of black people, too.

The fascists had a permit to march and they were acting within their rights. The left showed up to try to deprive them of those rights.

And right there any sympathy I may have had for the leftists vaporized.

Anymore they're nothing but bullies who want to intimidate anyone they don't like into silence. I fucking LOATHE bullies and anyone who employs bullying tactics is to me someone deserving of a brutal and merciless beat down. I don't give a fuck if the bully is a fascist, a Nazi, a communist, a Democrat, a Muslim, a Christian whackjob, or one of those fucked up radical orthodox Jews: I hate them all and would be thrilled to give them all the choice of renouncing their bullshit or jumping into a woodchipper.

But that won't happen.

What will happen next is that the repercussions will include statues of MalcomX, Martin Luther King, and etc, being torn down in the middle of the night in retaliation for the needless destruction of Confederate monuments.

And have you noticed the timing on this horseshit?

The statues are suddenly the most important thing to the left and the Democrats because their limpdicked Russia narrative is finally impoding and because their hatred at Trump's handling of North Korea came off looking pathetic when North Korea backed down and didn't fire their missiles at Guam this week.

So they had to move the topic to the next thing in their playbook and that was Confederate/Southern heritage.

What'll it be next?

I know you didn't directly, but you also forget about the protesters - with a permit to protest - also came armed to riot. Now, I'm not a fan of needing a permit to peacefully protest, but I understand the reasons behind it. But notice I say 'peaceful' protest. Neither side wanted a peaceful protest. Calling one out as a bully, but ignoring the other doing the same thing are the same blinders that Martin wears.

And that's as far as I'm going in this thread. It belongs in the other one.

[N_Fiddledog]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

Exactly. Which is why the Fascists begat the anti-Fascists. Without one, there wouldn't be the other.

Kind of...but if you follow it to its origins we're talking warring factions of socialists. Then we're talking chicken or the egg as to who begat who.

[Thanos]

American Nazis believe in absolutely none of the social or communitarian aspects of national socialism that the Germans did. Ask a single one of those idiots if they believe in wide-ranging government-run housing/education/work programs, even for poor American whites, and they'll laugh in your face. They all spout the usual deranged American belief that runaway capitalism is the best economic system to have and that anyone who can't make it, once again even poor whites, can just go sit in a ditch and starve to death. The only economic change they want to have it to kick all the Jews out of capitalism altogether.

"Socialists"? Fuck off, you don't know what you're talking about as usual.

[BartSimpson]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/17/misso ... d/?print=1

$1:

Missouri State Senator: ‘I Hope Trump Is Assassinated!’

A Missouri state senator said in a now-deleted Facebook post that she hopes President Donald Trump is assassinated.

Maria Chappelle-Nadal acknowledged on Thursday that she wrote a post which read: “I hope Trump is assassinated!”

She made the comment in an exchange with a left-wing activist who claimed that his cousin is a Secret Service agent.

Chappelle-Nadal confirmed to a reporter with St. Louis TV station KMOX that she posted the comment.

“I put something up on my personal Facebook page and it has now been deleted,” she said.

Chappelle-Nadal, a Democrat, represents a district in a St. Louis suburb.

It is not clear exactly what prompted Chappelle-Nadal’s comment. But it was likely made in response to a discussion about the ongoing controversy over Trump’s comments about the violence in Charlottesville, Va. over the weekend.

Don't anyone tell me how tolerant or peaceful these fuckers are. They aren't.

[Thanos]

Neil nails it as usual:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/donald-t ... -1.4250236

$1:

There's a weary sameness now to the coverage of President Donald Trump, not that it's the fault of the people doing the covering.

How many times can you ask and answer the same questions? Is he a hypocrite? Does he lie?

He is, and he does. Hypocrisy oozes from him like pus from a septic infection.

And what were once silly mendacities about crowd sizes or being secretly bugged by Barack Obama have now become uglier, more seditious things, reminiscent of his racist lie about the Obama family's secret conspiracy to conceal the fact that their son was born abroad — somewhere, you know, black and Muslim — and therefore was ineligible for the presidency.

Were Trump still merely one of the business world's foremost mountebanks, or a cheapjack TV star, the matter would be settled, and unremarkable. There are many such people, and it's easy to turn your back and ignore them.

But Donald Trump is a man of unequalled power. He can, and probably will, attack other countries. He occupies an office Americans hold in almost religious regard.

So each new lie, each putrid outburst, every carefully coded racist or sexist utterance, has to somehow be squared with the title he holds.

Put bluntly, the slight minority of Americans who voted for Trump are getting exactly what they asked for.

Surely to goodness some of them must be looking in the mirror and reflecting on the small part they played in unleashing tribal hatreds in their Shining City on the Hill.

They wanted a man who would courageously stand up and shout "radical Islamic terror," a term the pusillanimous establishment politicians tried to avoid, for fear of further encouraging religious hatred.

Well, they got him. And he shouted that phrase to the heavens. But when a clean-cut young racist, one of those people who complain that America's "white European" (read: Christian) heritage is threatened, murderously aimed his powerful car at a crowd, seeking to advance a political agenda, precisely as the "radical Islamic terrorists" have been doing lately in Europe, what did Trump have to say?

Asked if it was terrorism, he oozed this reply: "You can call it terrorism. You can call it murder. You can call it whatever you want. … Is it murder? Is it terrorism? Then you get into legal semantics."

Uh-huh. By Trump's method of crudely defining and categorizing people, it was radical Christian terror, or at least radical terror by a man raised in a Christian family. But of course that cannot exist, because no real Christian would do such a thing.

Trump then returned to his original reaction: that there was plenty of blame to go around for what happened in Charlottesville over the weekend, when hundreds of neo-Nazis, angry people "of European descent" and garden-variety racists marched into the university town yelling about Jews and the need to maintain white ascendancy.

Trump, to the utter astonishment of decent-minded Americans, actually conflated this herd of swine with the protesters who met them. It was an exercise in moral equivalence, a semantic trick conservatives despise when the left uses it.

It reminded me of the oily pronouncements Yasser Arafat and his satraps used to issue whenever a nail-packed bomb would erupt in a Tel Aviv discotheque or a Jerusalem pizzeria, leaving the corpses and body parts of children and teens strewn knee-deep on the street.

We denounce all violence of all kinds by all sides, they would say.

Or: We do not condone it, but we understand it.

(Israeli authorities used more or less the same language after some atrocity by extremist settlers or soldiers).

It was meant to be clever, and reassuring to their base, but to anyone with a shred of decency, it stank of incitement.

Trump's weekend reaction to Charlottesville was no different. True, his advisers persuaded him later to issue an anodyne denunciation of the white supremacists who adore him so deeply (many in Charlottesville wore his demagogue-y "Make America Great Again" cap), but he quickly and angrily returned to moral equivalence by Tuesday.

The white supremacists and neo-Nazis, according to Trump, were attacked by the "very, very violent" members of what he called the "alt-left," who, he said, arrived "swinging clubs," intent on criminal mayhem.

Well. It is true the so-called Antifa movement does not follow the teachings of Gandhi, or Martin Luther King, counting on meekness and absorption of violence, or pacifism, to defeat violence. Some of them push back, hard.

But Antifa tactics fall far short of driving a car into a crowd, and they don't show up with assault rifles on their backs and bandoliers of ammo (although they might consider it, just for self-preservation, because sooner or later some of those heavily armed far-right "militia" types will open fire in the name of white European-heritage rights).

Trump also questioned why Charlottesville would want to remove the statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, who led the fight to preserve slavery.

Who will be next, Trump asked? Jefferson? Washington?

That was actually a good question. Both of those former presidents owned slaves. Jefferson sired a child on one, which had to qualify as rape, given a slave's inability to form proper consent.

But expunging history, as some on the left demand, is impossible. The correct path is to let its artifacts stand and serve as reminders. Auschwitz, for example, has not been bulldozed.

Recently, the New Yorker ran an analysis piece suggesting that Americans are so divided and filled with loathing for each other that a civil conflict is probably inevitable.

I tend to agree. And if that does happen, it will without question have been egged on by the current president.

Prominent members of his own party – House Speaker Paul Ryan, Sen. Marco Rubio, Sen. John McCain, Sen. Lindsey Graham, along with a slew of lesser-known Republicans – are turning from him in disgust over the Charlottesville episode.

Trump either ignores them, or issues threats and insults.

Deeply conservative writers like Charles Krauthammer call him a disgrace to the office. Trump yells, "fake news!"

The captains of industry on two of his business advisory councils distanced themselves, so Trump, after lashing out at a few of them, shrugged and disbanded the councils.

Soon enough, he will be alone, surrounded only by his admiring fellow racists. But he will still be governing from the Oval Office.

It bears repeating. Americans got what they asked for. And it oozes.