It seems that if the polls are anywhere near correct, the Muslim Obama, whose true citizenship is actually in question, could become the next POTUS. This to me flies in the face of all the contributors to this forum who claim that radical Islam (read Islam) was 100% responsible for 911. If that was so, then why are Americans poised to elect this man? From what I can gather, Obama hates just about everything that the U.S. once stood for, especially it's Christian foundations. A U.S. under Obama is liable to make bushes lawless tenure look like a walk in the park.
Obama Targets Second
Amendment For Death
10-28-8
See this current article (below) on the coming Obama gun ban.
http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?
AID=/20081027/EDITORIAL/810270334
Obama is working closely with the Soros-backed Australian Rebecca Peters. She wants
introduce a gun ban into the USA as she did in Australia.
Peters is the architect of the gun confiscation of Australians. It's now a nation
suffering consecutive rogue governments micro managing Aussie's lives.
_________________________________________________
Rebecca Peters is the director of the International Action Network on Small Arms.
Prior to her work with IANSA, Peters worked for the Open Society Institute, a private
foundation funded by George Soros.
She led Australia's National Coalition for Gun Control from 1992 to 1997.
The International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) is an international non-governmental organization recognized by the United Nations.[1] IANSA is based in London and has over 800 member organizations in 120 countries, working to stop the proliferation and use of small arms and light weapons.
IANSA's work has been supported by funders including the Governments of UK, Belgium, Sweden and Norway, as well as the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Compton Foundation, Ploughshares Fund, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Open Society Institute created by George Soros, Samuel Rubin Foundation and Christian Aid.
__________________________________
GUEST COLUMN
'Obamamania' May Assault Second Amendment, Bring 'Fairness' Doctrine
By Douglas Wellman Sr.
For The News-Sentinel
10-27-8
"Obamamania" having swept the nation through the anointing of Barack Obama by the liberal media and the money from likeminded socialists, it is, indeed, possible Obama will be our next president. Obama's election will bring about an assault on many of our cherished American rights and freedoms.
I predict one of the first things we see will be the most draconian gun control bill introduced by Sen. Schumer (D-N.Y.) that will be supported by Obama. I predict this bill will make the unconstitutional gun ban enacted in 1994 and dubbed the "Clinton gun ban" look mild.
Obama's record on the Second Amendment is as follows:
1. He has supported a complete ban on handguns
2. He voted to ban most rifle ammunition
3. He refused to sign a brief supporting an individual right in the "Heller" case
4. He supported the lawsuits that were designed to destroy the firearm industry
5. He opposes the right to carry for self-defense
6. He supports gun registration (which in Germany before WWII was used to disarm the Jews and used in Australia to disarm its citizens)
7. He served on the board of the Joyce Foundation, a rabidly anti-Second Amendment organization
8. He voted to allow prosecution of citizens for using firearms for self-defense in their own homes.
These are just a few of the problematic facts relating to Obama's stand on the Second Amendment. He takes these positions despite the fact that wherever concealed- carry laws have been adopted, there has been a reduction in crime. You can also look forward to an international gun ban treaty, being funded by self-anointed messiah George Soros and put together by Rebecca Peters, who was behind the gun confiscation in Australia, to be presented eventually to the Senate for ratification.
Sadly, Obama's position on the Second Amendment wasn't even addressed in the debates. The reason for this is that when all of the facts are known, it's a losing cause for the liberals.
You can also look for the liberals in Congress to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. The Fairness Doctrine will be an attempt to stifle conservative views by forcing the stations that air talk radio to provide equal airtime to the liberal viewpoints, which are everywhere every day except for talk radio.
The liberals for years have had control of the mainstream media. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The L.A. Times, USA Today, etc., have spewed forth liberal propaganda for years. The problem for them now is that there is talk radio and the Internet. They can't stand the fact that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram, Glen Beck and others have a venue to air their opinions. They are upset that many of their pet programs went down in defeat because they were exposed for what they were. How many times has the switchboard in Washington, D.C., been shut down with such a large volume of callers forcing a change in direction?
The Internet provided the platform to expose Dan Rather using a forged document in an attempt to influence an election.
Liberals attempted to compete in the market with conservative talk radio with their "Air America." George Soros also kicked in several million dollars to get it off the ground. It failed because no one was listening. They could not get advertising as a result.
And let us not forget Obama's plan for economic redistribution. Taking Americans' hard-earned money and giving it to someone else. That is the only way he can give tax cuts to 95 percent of Americans.
Our Constitution will be under assault as it never has been before. James Madison, chief architect of the Constitution and our fourth president, said the following: "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."
Be concerned. Be very concerned.
Douglas H. Wellman Sr. is a resident of Fort Wayne.
Forum Elite 
CKA Elite 
