| |
ridenrain
CKA Uber
Posts: 22826
 Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:52 am
Is the milch cow finally waking up?
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:01 am
32% of Quebecois are completely nuts.
|
Posts: 6452
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:55 am
32% is about the numbers of separatists.
|
Posts: 8545
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:21 am
Ontario has given more. Imagine how they feel.
|
Posts: 7107
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:44 am
sandorski wrote: Ontario has given more. Imagine how they feel. To Who???
|
Posts: 8545
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:27 pm
Yogi wrote: sandorski wrote: Ontario has given more. Imagine how they feel. To Who??? The whole Country. Read up on it. They've been Paying out since the begining of Confederation. Last year was the first year they have ever recieved more than they paid out.
|
ridenrain
CKA Uber
Posts: 22826
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:43 pm
You need to remember that every federal party has been buying the votes of Ontario and Quebec since confederation.
|
Posts: 17114
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:44 pm
ridenrain wrote: You need to remember that every federal party has been buying the votes of Ontario and Quebec since confederation. Oh, and that somehow makes it any less legitimate? 
|
Posts: 13354
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:25 pm
ridenrain wrote: You need to remember that every federal party has been buying the votes of Ontario and Quebec since confederation. Yeah, they've never spent federal money anywhere else right?
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:34 pm
lol, kinda interesting - particularly when you have a province that has habitually and historically been a taker - then, when they no longer receive due to financial fortune(s), they don't want to give.
What's with that I ask. . . .
|
Posts: 4072
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:43 pm
karra wrote: lol, kinda interesting - particularly when you have a province that has habitually and historically been a taker - then, when they no longer receive due to financial fortune(s), they don't want to give.
What's with that I ask. . . . We're "habitual" takers? Huh? Does anyone have a chart on historic equalization payments? *(I have one but I don't think it's accurate).
|
Bibbi
Active Member
Posts: 356
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:00 pm
Well, if every province thinks they are giving in, more than they are taking then who is getting the equalization payments?
|
Posts: 14886
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:04 pm
Bibbi wrote: Well, if every province thinks they are giving in, more than they are taking then who is getting the equalization payments? Quebec, they are getting enough for three provinces.
|
Posts: 4072
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:14 pm
Total Per Capita
1961 -470 -353
1962 -380 -278
1963 -316 -225
1964 -253 -178
1965 -229 -158
1966 243 166
1967 396 266
1968 718 472
1969 895 574
1970 762 478
1971 660 401
1972 889 526
1973 2,229 1,294
1974 11,260 6,424
1975 10,479 5,812
1976 8,853 4,751
1977 9,176 4,729
1978 7,795 3,869
1979 13,745 6,578
1980 25,409 11,641
1981 29,089 12,735
1982 20,200 8,563
1983 9,368 3,924
1984 7,008 2,933
1985 5,501 2,292
1986 1,648 680
1987 1,418 583
1988 1,365 557
1989 1,450 582
1990 2,185 860
1991 1,502 581
1992 1,369 521
1993 2,330 875
1994 3,075 1,140
1995 3,406 1,248
1996 4,994 1,803
1997 7,263 2,573
1998 8,653 2,996
1999 8,747 2,969
2000 10,561 3,524
2001 10,244 3,358
2002 10,317 3,319
Total 243,554 105,405
These are the only numbers I have (adjusted to 2003 $) but I don't think they're 100% accurate.
|
 
|
Page 1 of 2
|
[ 16 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
|
CKA Super Elite 
Forum Elite 
