[Newsbot]

Title: Which Canadian city has the most sugar daddies?
Category: lifestyle
Posted By: Regina
Date: 2012-10-11 06:11:23
Canadian

[saturn_656]

You're supposed to try and avoid the gold diggers... not shack up with them.

[DrCaleb]

saturn_656 wrote:

You're supposed to try and avoid the gold diggers... not shack up with them.

Yes you are. Just keep them in different cities. Keeping them less than 100 km apart is a bad idea.

[saturn_656]

DrCaleb wrote:

saturn_656 wrote:

You're supposed to try and avoid the gold diggers... not shack up with them.

Yes you are. Just keep them in different cities. Keeping them less than 100 km apart is a bad idea.

Lesson learned through experience?

[Toastmaker]

Don't know about Canada, but Sugarland, Texas gets my vote. . . !

[Thanos]

I call bullshit on this one. In Fort McMurray the male-to-female ratio is running at about 2 to 1 in a place full of guys, even the coverall wearers, that are making massive amounts of cash. The women literally have the pick-of-the-litter up there when it comes to trolling for big bucks and an easy lifestyle.

[DrCaleb]

saturn_656 wrote:

DrCaleb wrote:

saturn_656 wrote:

You're supposed to try and avoid the gold diggers... not shack up with them.

Yes you are. Just keep them in different cities. Keeping them less than 100 km apart is a bad idea.

Lesson learned through experience?

Just a personal rule. I figure then there is no way they could ever accidently meet. Hasn't happened yet, which is why I'm still living.

[2Cdo]

Thanos wrote:

I call bullshit on this one. In Fort McMurray the male-to-female ratio is running at about 2 to 1 in a place full of guys, even the coverall wearers, that are making massive amounts of cash. The women literally have the pick-of-the-litter up there when it comes to trolling for big bucks and an easy lifestyle.

What's the difference between a Victoria girl and a Cadillac?













Not everyone's been in a Cadillac.

[raydan]

Quote:

...women “seeking mutually beneficial relationships.”

Is this the politically correct way of saying that these women are whores?




I have no problems with it, just curious.

[2Cdo]

I always found Victoria to be the easiest city in Canada for an employed man to sleep with women who were far better looking than he deserved!

[Brenda]

raydan wrote:

Quote:

...women “seeking mutually beneficial relationships.”

Is this the politically correct way of saying that these women are whores?




I have no problems with it, just curious.

Considering the fact that this "study" is about "men having more than 7 sex partners per year", it seems to me that it is the men who are whores

[raydan]

Brenda wrote:

raydan wrote:

Quote:

...women “seeking mutually beneficial relationships.”

Is this the politically correct way of saying that these women are whores?




I have no problems with it, just curious.

Considering the fact that this "study" is about "men having more than 7 sex partners per year", it seems to me that it is the men who are whores

It's the one who receives the money in exchange for sex that's a whore, not the other way around... even if she/he only has one customer.

[Brenda]

raydan wrote:

Brenda wrote:

raydan wrote:

Is this the politically correct way of saying that these women are whores?




I have no problems with it, just curious.

Considering the fact that this "study" is about "men having more than 7 sex partners per year", it seems to me that it is the men who are whores

It's the one who receives the money in exchange for sex that's a whore, not the other way around... even if she/he only has one customer.

There's nothing stated about any monetary compensation...

With that logic, btw, every stay at home mom is a whore...

[2Cdo]

Brenda wrote:

There's nothing stated about any monetary compensation...

The very term "sugar daddy" implies that there were financial benefits.

Quote:

With that logic, btw, every stay at home mom is a whore...

These girls are not in the same league as a stay at home mom. I'm not defending these men but you could phrase it differently by referring to these women as "gold diggers"!

[raydan]

Brenda wrote:

There's nothing stated about any monetary compensation...

With that logic, btw, every stay at home mom is a whore...

Look up the definition of "sugar daddy" first.

Second, I would say that someone who marries principally for the other person's money is prostituting him/her self. A stay at home mom is more along the lines of a lifestyle choice... and don't forget, there are also stay at home dads.