[Newsbot]

Title: 'Why are you still endorsing him'' Obama asks Republican leaders about Trump
Category: Uncle Sam
Posted By: Robair
Date: 2016-08-02 10:14:57

[Freakinoldguy]

Probably because as odorous as he can be he's still better than the alternative.

[PluggyRug]

That coming from one of the most ineffectual presidents the US has ever suffered.

[BartSimpson]

Obama can go fuck himself, he endorsed Hillary so he's got no right to question anyone else's endorsement.

[BeaverFever]

1) I'm no Hillary fan, but how on earth can Trump be better than Hillary?

2) Obama is ineffectual or he single-handedly ruined America and rules like a tyrant? It can't be both. Will the right-wing empty rhetoric machine please clarify?

2a) Is it possible to introduce one of the most comprehensive changes in modern times like Obamacare and still be "the most ineffectual president?" What is this claim based on anyway?

[PluggyRug]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

1) I'm no Hillary fan, but how on earth can Trump be better than Hillary?


2a) Is it possible to introduce one of the most comprehensive changes in modern times like Obamacare and still be "the most ineffectual president?" What is this claim based on anyway?

Obamacare, you picked his most dismal failure (although appointing Hillary Clinton to secretary of state ranks up there).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevemoore/ ... 2eefd8770a

[N_Fiddledog]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

1) I'm no Hillary fan, but how on earth can Trump be better than Hillary?

Well, the worst you can say about Trump is maybe he should be in some sort of psychological rehab centre. Hilary should be in Prison.

[stratos]

$1:

2a) Is it possible to introduce one of the most comprehensive changes in modern times like Obamacare and still be "the most ineffectual president?" What is this claim based on anyway?

It was not introduced, it was crammed down Americas throat. Even Congress had no time to read it before they were told to vote on it. Sense the Dems fell in line and controlled both houses at the time it passed.

[BRAH]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Obama can go fuck himself, he endorsed Hillary so he's got no right to question anyone else's endorsement.

The only reason Obama cares is because these parents are Muslim.

[Canadian_Mind]

I was always under the impression that the current president is supposed to act impartial to the current election?

[andyt]

Really? Never seen a sitting pres campaign for the nominee of his party before, and said nominee vying for the endorsement of the pres? Alternate universes, I guess. The only reason you didn't hear as much about Bush stumping for McCAin or Romeny is because they wanted to distance themselves from him. You may want to google the matter.

[BartSimpson]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

2a) Is it possible to introduce one of the most comprehensive changes in modern times like Obamacare and still be "the most ineffectual president?" What is this claim based on anyway?

Obamacare? You mean the program whose $5,000 and $10,000 deductibles along with 300% rate increases are bankrupting people at a higher rate than before?

http://medcitynews.com/2016/04/obamacar ... ankruptcy/

Could you afford a $10,000 deductible for a surgery?

Thirteen of the nations Obamacare exchanges have gone under because the balance of recipients outnumbers their paid members?

http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/01/obama ... ld-follow/

Obamacare is a CLUSTERFUCK and you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise.

[BartSimpson]

Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:

I was always under the impression that the current president is supposed to act impartial to the current election?

No, they usually campaign for their party's candidate...and at taxpayer expense which always pisses me off.

[BeaverFever]

PluggyRug PluggyRug:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

1) I'm no Hillary fan, but how on earth can Trump be better than Hillary?


2a) Is it possible to introduce one of the most comprehensive changes in modern times like Obamacare and still be "the most ineffectual president?" What is this claim based on anyway?

Obamacare, you picked his most dismal failure (although appointing Hillary Clinton to secretary of state ranks up there).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevemoore/ ... 2eefd8770a

1) You didn't address my other questions

2) You said INEFFECTUAL which means incapable of causing any effect, good or bad. An editorial about Obacares allegedly disasterous effect doesn't support your accusation of INEFFECTUAL

3) Your article is an opinion piece, and one year old at that. Is that the best you can do?

Here are some for you:

http://huffpost.com/us/entry/9637228

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-m ... e-is-doing

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik ... story.html

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/17/obamacar ... -rate.html

[BeaverFever]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

2a) Is it possible to introduce one of the most comprehensive changes in modern times like Obamacare and still be "the most ineffectual president?" What is this claim based on anyway?

Obamacare? You mean the program whose $5,000 and $10,000 deductibles along with 300% rate increases are bankrupting people at a higher rate than before?

http://medcitynews.com/2016/04/obamacar ... ankruptcy/

Could you afford a $10,000 deductible for a surgery?

Thirteen of the nations Obamacare exchanges have gone under because the balance of recipients outnumbers their paid members?

http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/01/obama ... ld-follow/

Obamacare is a CLUSTERFUCK and you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise.

Say what you want, none of what you mention above describes "ineffectual".