CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 29481
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:51 am
 


Title: Yesterday, in the middle of Summer, Greenland Gained a Record-Smashing 4 Gigatons of Snow and Ice
Category: Environmental
Posted By: uwish
Date: 2020-08-11 06:59:15


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 37984
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:51 am
 


You are funny. Every time you try to prove your feelings on this subject, you get wrecked by the data.

Image

http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4802
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:32 am
 


not my feelings, just facts. We are cooling not warming.

The ENTIRE global warming climate crisis is a fraud..

https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blo ... o-be-fraud


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 37984
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:45 am
 


No, we aren't. Your opinion is just that without data. Just the tiny part of an ocean that computer re-creations say might be cooling leads you to believe the data collected over decades is invalid? Show me the data. Big claims require big proof.

The overwhelming data, from multiple independent sources disagrees with you and no matter how you move the goalposts that isn't going to change.

Like, one day of snowfall won't change the years of melting that Greenland is experiencing.

Look at all the gigatonnes of mass Greenland has lost:

Image

https://www.climato.uliege.be/cms/c_565 ... -greenland

Look at all the mass lost in the ice:
Image

http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/

4 Gigatonnes of gain isn't even a puddle in the hundreds of gigtonnes lost. You wishing it so doesn't change it.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4802
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:49 am
 


fraud


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 37984
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:51 am
 


Big claims require big proof.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4802
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:05 pm
 


Mann's graph is a fraud, NASA has admitted to manipulating temperature data (surface). The ball is not in my court, it is in the climate emergency court. All I need is one piece of data that falsifies any global warming alarmist and the theory is done.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 37984
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:11 pm
 


uwish wrote:
All I need is one piece of data that falsifies any global warming alarmist and the theory is done.


You are arguing empirical data using opinion. I got tired of the 'Mann is a fraud' argument 20 years ago. If you want to show it's inaccurate, you are going to have to show all the sources proving it are inaccurate.

Then you are going to have to show data showing all the other sources that aren't Mann's graph, that prove Manns graph, are also inaccurate. IIRC, there are 25,000 independent sources that prove Mann was correct.

https://www.independent.co.uk/environme ... 37881.html

Big claims require big proof.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4802
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:13 pm
 


Consensus means nothing in science. NOTHING.

Fraud all of it. I don't need to spell out all the issues with Man's data. They did that in court, where he LOST.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 37984
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:25 pm
 


So, he loses a defamation suit where deniers called him a child molester, and you think that reflects on climate change? [huh] That's how the deniers spun it?

And that page lists all the sources and groups who have proof of climate change, it isn't about 'consensus'. But you'd know that if you read it.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4802
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:38 pm
 


Fraud


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 37984
PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:25 am
 


Still not seeing any proof.

And you know very well that in Science one proof against a theory does not invalidate that theory. It simply modifies it to fit the rest of the data. And the other 24,999 data sets that prove Mann are still valid.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4802
PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:08 am
 


fraud


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 37984
PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:14 am
 


Yep. Keep chanting that and it might become true.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4802
PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:17 am
 


that's what climate alarmist do..

fraud


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.