[Newsbot]

<strong>Title:Thursday On CBC </strong> <a href="/article/235929663-" target="_blank"></a>
<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/topics/-" target="_blank"></a>
<strong>Written By: </strong> <a href="/profiles/" target="_blank"></a>
<strong>Date: </strong> Tuesday, November 30 at 00:00<br><br>
<br><a href="/article/235929663-">read more >></a>

[C.M. Burns]

What a very green post!

[C.M. Burns]

"Three weeks after their invasion of Iraq , the U.S. government decides the Tar Sands should be counted as part of Canada ’s energy supply"

To whom did it belong before the illegal Iraq invasion? America?

[N Say]

I wondered about that also. It must be a typo.

[C.M. Burns]

I think we can safely say that America thinks it belongs to them

[sasquatch2]

And what conclusion do we divine with a thread without a title or an originator?

[Dr Caleb]

C.M. Burns C.M. Burns:

"Three weeks after their invasion of Iraq , the U.S. government decides the Tar Sands should be counted as part of Canada ’s energy supply"

To whom did it belong before the illegal Iraq invasion? America?

It wasn't considered 'viable' before because we didn't have the technology to extract it all. Counting the amount we are able to extract, we have the second largest reserves behind Saudi Arabia. Counting all of it, including the stuff we don't know how to extract, we have more than SA.

sasquatch2 sasquatch2:

And what conclusion do we divine with a thread without a title or an originator?

Spooky! One of those bugs from the new code base. The title of the article isn't always picked up in the Forum.

[N Say]

After watching I think I would like to spit in Ralph Klein's face. (I'm also thinking many things that would get me banned from this site :p )

here's the page for the show:
http://www.cbc.ca/doczone/tarsands/

Looks like it will be on again on Sunday, if anyone missed it.

[mtbr]

The CBC ...biting the hand that feeds it . What a biased piece of shit they call journalism. Not a documentary but someones commentary. Horseshit.