[martin14]

andyt wrote:

Using legal means to try to defeat one party seems democratic to me.

Andy, learn to read.

I didnt say the site was illegal, I said the name was a misnomer.


Perhaps I should say it again really slowly so all the leftoids can get it.




THE







NAME







OF



THE





SITE



IS






BULLSHIT





!!!!!







is that slow enough ?

[andyt]

Project democracy by using democratic means to get the result the want. I call bullshit to your bullshit.

[martin14]

andyt wrote:

Project democracy by using democratic means to get the result the want. I call bullshit to your bullshit.

very good, andy

26 pages of economic fail a few days ago, now this.

[Canadian_Mind]

You people are idiots. What happened to merely discussing who you are voting for, and why? What's with the partisan bullshit?

[EyeBrock]

martin14 wrote:

andyt wrote:

Project democracy by using democratic means to get the result the want. I call bullshit to your bullshit.

very good, andy

26 pages of economic fail a few days ago, now this.

Ooh I like the clapping thing Martin!

[PublicAnimalNo9]

Canadian_Mind wrote:

You people are idiots. What happened to merely discussing who you are voting for, and why? What's with the partisan bullshit?

It's election day, the vitriol needs to be ramped up to make sure you vote the way someone else wants you to

[SteveK]

Yeah, sorry, that was my bad. I'll drop it, even though I still disagree.

[SprCForr]

Reminder:

The polls aren't closed so anything relating to election results and related things should not be posted.

There is no way Trevor needs BS from the gubmint on this.

Thanks for the cooperation.

[Mr_Canada]

Someone call Elections Canada - I'm committing a thought crime, ehehehe

I'll keep shut here though...

[dino_bobba_renno]

andyt wrote:

raydan wrote:

The site is anti-Harper to the extreme... the reason for it's existance is to get rid of Harper and the Cons, which disqualifies it as being democratic.

So you're saying I'm anti-democratic because I strategically voted to keep out Harper. Harper's goal is to destroy the Liberal party, is he undemocratic?

I'll apologize now for even responding to this on this thread but i can't help myself .

Harper doesn't need to destroy the Liberal party, they're doing a fine job of that all by themselves.

[Lemmy]

dino_bobba_renno wrote:

Harper doesn't need to destroy the Liberal party, they're doing a fine job of that all by themselves.

Not just "doesn't need to", but "isn't capable of". The only thing Harper is capable of destroying is the buffet at the all-you-can-eat. This is self-induced meltdown not unlike the Torrie one of 1993.

[saturn_656]

Mr_Canada wrote:

Someone call Elections Canada - I'm committing a thought crime, ehehehe

I'll keep shut here though...

Don't post on the board... but feel free to PM me. I want to know WTH is going on.