Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 16802
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 1:11 am
 


Filibuster Cartoons
Title: Canada's newest ride (click to view)
Date: September 30, 2010
In what is being heralded as a great victory for social libertarians, the Ontario Supreme Court struck down several of Canada's anti-prostitution laws yesterday, paving the way for the legalization of the world's oldest profession in that province.

Prostitution law in Canada is famously strange. Technically the act of buying sex is not illegal, but just about everything else associated with the practice is. Asking someone to have sex with you for money, for instance. Or making money from having sex.

In her ruling, Justice Susan Himel declared these regulations to be unconstitutional, on the basis that they violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom's guarantees of personal liberty and sovereignty of the individual. Granting legal status to the sex trade, she said, will ultimately help secure the safety and dignity of prostitutes, as they are able to move out of the shadows and into a profession able to license its workers and screen its clients.

The Canadian press has gone a bit hysterical over the ruling, and some headlines have made it seem as if prostitution is now destined to be universally legal across the country. I'd call for a bit of restraint. For starters, the ruling — which again, only applies to Ontario — is almost certainly going to be appealed by both the federal and provincial governments, both of whom have strongly stated that they do not support legalizing the sex trade. And even if the case makes it all the way to the Supreme Court, and gets a favorable ruling there — which is plausible, given the ideological makeup of the bench — my own thinking is that the politicians will push very strongly back, perhaps even evoking Canada's "notwithstanding clause" to override any attempt at national legalization.

Some pundits have drawn analogies to Canada's path to national gay marriage, which also came about via a provincial court ruling that was then cited as precedent in other courts across the country. But gay marriage was a fashionable cause, and did have considerable support in the governing party of the time. Prostitution, in contrast, is still a strongly unpopular issue, and no party that I can see is willing to identify as a passionate proponent of legalization. Definitely not the kind of issue anyone wants to fight an election on, in any case.

The ruling is, however, a great boon to those who enjoy the idea of Canada as some sort of "Northern Holland," where anything goes and nothing is taboo. Even in the era of Stephen Harper, it's an image that just won't go away...


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 4964
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:00 am
 


Funniest fillibuster cartoon in awhile.

And while I'd never do it, I personally wouldn't care if prostitution is legalised... Maybe even support it. Reasons being are that there will be more tax revenue from the trade. Second would hopefully be less healthcare costs stemming from people with deadly diseases from prostitution once a system is established.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3351
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:11 am
 


It always seems that this sort of thing comes about through the court systems (in both Canada and the US). Whence comes the judicial motivation for overturning laws that have stood for years upon years? I'm not sure how long Canada's laws against prostitution have been in place, but it seems as though there should be a higher standard of review than the opinions of one politically appointed judge.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13354
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:38 am
 


I'm all for legalizing it personally.

It would make it safer and healthier for all involved and increase tax revenues at the same time.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3387
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:40 am
 


bootlegga wrote:
I'm all for legalizing it personally.

It would make it safer and healthier for all involved and increase tax revenues at the same time.


And what's with the moral of people?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3102
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:07 am
 


Post buddy. Here we live in a society that presently seems to want to put everyone in a protective bubble. I'm guessing that the judge saw the need for prostitutes to have equal access to their protective bubble regardless of some persons feeling the move is amoral. :)


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3387
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:10 am
 


Wada wrote:
Post buddy. Here we live in a society that presently seems to want to put everyone in a protective bubble. I'm guessing that the judge saw the need for prostitutes to have equal access to their protective bubble regardless of some persons feeling the move is amoral. :)

Cool, now young people don't need to study, just move apart their legs for money :)


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20757
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:15 am
 


bootlegga wrote:
I'm all for legalizing it personally.

It would make it safer and healthier for all involved and increase tax revenues at the same time.



The girl I was sending over to your house will be a little bit late tonight OK. The goat you requested got into the supply of adult diapers you wanted and chewed them up so she has to pick up some new ones. To compensate she'll through in the anal beads for free.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3102
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:23 am
 


Hey! There's plenty of legs moving apart not for money still and those who do it just for money won't be considered criminals is all. Morals don't have alot to do with it. :)


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3387
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:25 am
 


Wada wrote:
Hey! There's plenty of legs moving apart not for money still and those who do it just for money won't be considered criminals is all. Morals don't have alot to do with it. :)

Yeah, like we are saying here "Legs are moving apart just for idea, not for money" :D


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3102
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:31 am
 


R=UP


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 337
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:43 am
 


If it works in Nevada and it can work all over the United States. If woman want to be prostitutes. So be it. I would like it legalized so these sex workers have a save work environment run by the state.


Offline
Forum Junkie
Forum Junkie
 Montreal Canadiens
Profile
Posts: 673
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:54 am
 


PostFactum wrote:
Wada wrote:
Post buddy. Here we live in a society that presently seems to want to put everyone in a protective bubble. I'm guessing that the judge saw the need for prostitutes to have equal access to their protective bubble regardless of some persons feeling the move is amoral. :)

Cool, now young people don't need to study, just move apart their legs for money :)



Well, the fact is that people already do it, and did it for ages. The difference would be that if a dude crack her head with a baseball bat, the gal will be able to go to the police and not be arrested.

Also, I'm totally for it. And more than that, I would suggest that the government is the one and only boss of Closes Houses. Much like the SAQ (Société des alcools du Québec) in Quebec. With this, I would be damn sure that the profit would be directly in my pocket, and that no crime organisations get gains from it.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3351
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:27 pm
 


The_Doctor wrote:
If it works in Nevada and it can work all over the United States. If woman want to be prostitutes. So be it. I would like it legalized so these sex workers have a save work environment run by the state.

"A safe work environment run by the state" is one of the most worrisome things I have heard in a while, especially in this context.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 337
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:30 pm
 


Pseudonym wrote:
The_Doctor wrote:
If it works in Nevada and it can work all over the United States. If woman want to be prostitutes. So be it. I would like it legalized so these sex workers have a save work environment run by the state.

"A safe work environment run by the state" is one of the most worrisome things I have heard in a while, especially in this context.


Sorry I meant regulated by the state like it is currently in Nevada.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.