Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 16198
PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:28 am
 


<strong>Filibuster Cartoon</strong>
<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="http://www.filibustercartoons.com/archive.php?id=20061203" target="_blank">Dion-mania!</a> (click to view)
<strong>Date: </strong> December 03, 2006

On Saturday former environment minister Stephane Dion was elected as the new leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. It was a dramatic come-from-behind win, as Dion had previously been considered an also-ran, overshadowed by his two more... interesting opponents. <br> <br>In the end though, frontrunners Michael Ignatieff and Robert Rae apparently proved to be too controversial for their own good. So instead, the Liberals have settled on a bland, academic nerd from Quebec to be their prime ministerial candidate in the next election.


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:13 am
 


Don't really know what to make of it, but I just can't understand Canada's penchant for uninspiring candidates. At least in the United States we have the good sense to only let them go so high.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1553
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:16 am
 


It could have been a Trudeau... that would have spiced up the board.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 422
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:20 am
 


Sounds like Ian-Duncan-Smith again.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3039
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:21 am
 


The USA has had Walter Mondale, Bob Dole, Dan Quale, Jimmy Carter, Ralph Nader, and John Edwards. We have our share of bland nobody officials.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1553
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:22 am
 


Quale was a hoot!


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:25 am
 


Psudo wrote:
The USA has had Walter Mondale, Bob Dole, Dan Quale, Jimmy Carter, Ralph Nader, and John Edwards. We have our share of bland nobody officials.


True, but Canada has a tendency to elect them to their premiership while dullard presidential candidates have been at an immediate disadvantage in the United States for the past half-century at the very least. Bush II, Clinton, Reagan, and Carter were all fairly exciting candidates, and even Bush I looked better in comparison to Dukakis.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 10567
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:14 am
 


Bob Dole and his viagra comercials were a riot.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1553
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:17 am
 


Aint that the truth!


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 10567
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:19 am
 


"....Carter were all fairly exciting candidates...."

Carter was elected because Ford was looked upon as a bumbeler and a fool when he said that poland was its own nation and was not controled by the USSR. This was back in the mid 70's. Poland was very dominated by the soviet union. Also his blanket pardon of Nixon was highly contriversial (sp?) at the time.

Cater was probely one of the most decent men elected as president in the last 100 yrs. But he realy could not be a hard ass when needed and made major errors with the US currency when he took the US off the gold standard market. Best thing I can say about him is he did keep the hostages alive with his very limited response to their captivity in Iran.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 422
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:27 am
 


stratos wrote:
Cater was probely one of the most decent men elected as president in the last 100 yrs.


I'd say Ike would give Carter a run for his money in that regard.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1553
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:30 am
 


"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."

- President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 11/8/54


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 422
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:39 am
 


USCAdad wrote:
"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."

- President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 11/8/54


I rest my case. I mean, the guy had to deal with De Gaulle and Churchill! That would be enough to drive anyone nuts.


Offline
Newbie
Newbie
Profile
Posts: 17
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:02 am
 


"So instead, the Liberals have settled on a bland, academic nerd from Quebec to be their prime ministerial candidate in the next election."

Yup. And who is the Prime Minister now? A bland, academic nerd from Alberta.

This was a play-it-safe pick, in my mind...if the party wanted to risk reaching out to the west, Kennedy would make the best choice. Ignatieff probably would have been a disaster, since everything they pick on Steve for he supports, and Rae was just too much of a gamble, with his record. Dion will, barring disaster, keep the "Westmount Rhodesians," the Atlantic seats, and hold on to the Ontario seats, and the party will probably just hope for 15-25 more by circumstances to cruise to a minority.

Inspiring? Of course. When has the Liberal Party not been?


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 422
PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:28 am
 


Quote:
"Westmount Rhodesians,"


Whoa! Rhodesia still lives in in parts of Canada?!


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  1  2  3  4  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.