Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 16802
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2011 7:18 pm
 


Filibuster Cartoons
Title: Hair today, gone tomorrow for the Republicans (click to view)
Date: May 16, 2011
Since my last toon, which sized up the implausibly large and disparate crop of Republican presidential contenders, pseudo-contenders, and contender pretenders, there have been two major game-changing shakeups in the field.

First, Mike Huckabee, the man who seemingly had the most to lose from dropping his sweet job at FOX to leap into the great shark tank of primary politics, announced on Saturday that he would not, in fact, be running. And now this morning, we hear that the guy who often polled neck-in-neck with Huck for first place support among the party faithful, Donald Trump, has decided he too would rather do another season of his show than make a bid for the Oval Office.

Whatever you think of them — and I personally don't think much of either — the withdrawal of these two colorful characters will clearly make the remaining GOP race a great deal duller, but perhaps a bit more substantial as well. The candidates who are poised to gain the most, after all, are the two perennial Miss Congenialities of the Republican crop, Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty. Both are respected for their "seriousness" and poll reasonably well, but have been largely overshadowed by Trump's flamboyant headline-grabbing antics, and the engaging drama of Huckabee's stage-shy coquettishness. With those two pre-packaged narratives out of the picture, the media — and voters — will now be forced to care much more about what these two fairly uncharismatic, fairly middle-of-the-road, former governors are doing and saying.

Or, perhaps not. Some analysts have been speculating that the withdraw of Huck and Trump actually benefits the fringe candidates more than the serious ones, since both men had particular, rather than mainstream, appeals that could have conceivably led to vote-splitting had they remained in crowded field.

As the most ostentatiously Christian of the lot, the appeal of Huckabee — a former Baptist minister — was always primary to evangelicals and social conservatives. With him out, presumably the status of "most socially conservative / Christian" candidate is up for grabs, and it's a title neither Romney (who was a traditional Massachusetts liberal on social matters until suspiciously recently) or Pawlenty (another blue state governor who has a slim record of engaging with so-called "morals" issues) has much of a claim to. Providing she actually does decide to jump into the race, many are predicting that Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann — a favorite of Huckabee and Glenn Beck and no stranger to fire-and-brimstone religious rhetoric — could move quickly to lay claim to that uniquely important segment of the GOP voting base.

Trump's appeal is a bit harder to quantify. Though some have rather politely suggested The Apprentice host's appeal comes from his business background, a less charitable reading would probably credit his shamelessness, anti-establishment pet causes, and outsider-looking-in rhetoric — crass though it often was. If former Trump supporters are looking for someone else who fits that mold, the most obvious choices would probably be one of the race's other eccentrics, like quixotic libertarian Ron Paul, or scrappy, sassy Herman Cain. If Cain were better-known, in fact, he'd be the obvious Trump successor, seeing as how neither guy has any experience in elected politics and claim political legitimacy simply from their respective successes in the private sector. But even then, it's equally possible that Trump's appeal was simply due to his own idiosyncratic "Trumpness" and celebrity status, none of which can be easily inherited by any other candidate.

While it's always fun to speculate on a race still in its most embryonic state, it's important to note that things really shouldn't be this uncertain at this point. With so many significant candidates still undeclared, and those who have declared campaigning in such a strategically quiet and cautious manner, the whole race continues to have a weird air of nervous precariousness to it, not unlike the so-called "phony war" phase of World War II. But the phoniness can only last so long. August 13 has now been set as the date for the Iowa Straw Poll, a symbolically significant vote that marks the first formal test of the campaign. Its results, which come seven months before the state's February caucus, and can provide a great deal of momentum to its winners, and lot of despair to its losers. So the clock is ticking.

By the way, alert reader "Psudo," whom we may recognize from the forums and comments, has created a nifty little guide to the GOP candidates that you can find here. It aims to provide a complete breakdown of where everyone stands on every major issue, but obviously he'll need some help with this ambitious undertaking. If you know a particular candidate's stance on an issue you currently see marked blank, just post a reply to this cartoon and I'm sure he'll see it and add it post-haste. He's good like that.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3351
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2011 8:24 pm
 


When's the next debate? I rather enjoyed the first one, and need my next political fix before I start suffering withdrawal. Symptoms may include getting on with my life and increased productivity towards things that matter.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 3266
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:02 am
 


They nearly postponed this debate until my sister's birthday, Sept 15th. I doubt there will be a second debate until roughly then.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Los Angeles Kings
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2238
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:14 am
 


NBC renewed "The Celebrity Apprentice," so Trump got exactly what he wanted.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14940
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 12:28 pm
 


Trumps out, Huckabees out and I hear people are starting to actually pay attention to the policy gaffs of Newt as he changes his mind on a 24 hour or less basis that he is no longer seen as a serious canidate either.

Could the GOP at long last be shedding the idiots? They have been long overdue for a cull. I hope Palin doesn't see this is her big chance and sticks to peddling books and speaking on Fox. It would be good to see serious policy issues being touted by serious canidates by the GOP for a change.



Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 3266
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 2:47 pm
 


She pronounced it "bona fee-days." I thought it was pronounced "bona fides."

I've never watched Rachel Maddow before. She's kinda annoying and clearly biased against Republicans generally, but her analysis on the candidates is mostly reasonable. One point where she was seriously wrong on is Mitch Daniels and why she thinks he's a non-candidate. Being economic advisor to Bush isn't hurting Daniels among Republicans because 1) the economy has been worse since Bush than it was during Bush's administration, 2) some of the economic problems of the Bush administration can be blamed on 9/11 and the fiscal crisis (Republicans don't blame Republicans for that). If everything is either the Republican Plan (tm) or the Democrat Plan (tm), then it seems the Republican Plan is better for the economy. Her dismissals of Santorum and Huntsman are premature, too.

Off-topic criticisms: She looks so awkward with that football; it's like me up there. Her gimmicks are not funny. STD screening is routine maintenance only for those for whom promiscuity is routine. OB/GYNs take Medicare. Where did women go for "routine maintenance" before Planned Parenthood existed? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the overall health situation of women did not change when Planned Parenthood was established and wouldn't change if it disappeared tomorrow. These arguments don't make Mitch Daniels a great candidate (he's not), they just make Rachel Maddow wrong, too.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12647
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 3:23 pm
 


Psudo wrote:
She pronounced it "bona fee-days." I thought it was pronounced "bona fides."


The Latin pronunciation is "bona fee-day." That said, "bona fide" is in such common usage that (unless you are reading an actual Latin passage) it would be a bit snobbish, IMHO, to say it "fee-day." There you go, my three years of Latin just paid off.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 3266
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 5:27 pm
 


Thank you, Zipperfish. psudo.trivia++;


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14940
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 8:52 pm
 


US healthcare vis-a-vie female preventive checkups sounds like an easy political target to those who would be voting for the GOP anyway.

I like Steven take as well:

http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/#clip467556


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Los Angeles Kings
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2238
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 9:16 pm
 


Scape wrote:
US healthcare vis-a-vie female preventive checkups sounds like an easy political target to those who would be voting for the GOP anyway.

I like Steven take as well:

http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/#clip467556

I'm not a fan of abortion (is anyone?), but I think a woman's access to birth control should be a right. I also want to see a male birth control pill already.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 3266
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 10:27 pm
 


I think these arguments depend on a scarcity that simply doesn't exist. Who can't find a drug store or ob/gyn in their area? They're about as scarce as Starbucks.

I don't see any particular reason to close down Planned Parenthood, but neither do I see how it's this horrible thing for women to have to go to a slightly different location for their medical care.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14940
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 10:42 pm
 


DanSC wrote:
Scape wrote:
US healthcare vis-a-vie female preventive checkups sounds like an easy political target to those who would be voting for the GOP anyway.

I like Steven take as well:

http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/#clip467556

I'm not a fan of abortion (is anyone?), but I think a woman's access to birth control should be a right. I also want to see a male birth control pill already.



I don't know about abortion access in the states but this doesn't sound like access to me:




and that's not even mentioning the extremists who are given all but a free hand at terrorism:



Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Los Angeles Kings
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2238
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:34 pm
 


Abortion access in the states works like this.

Step #1: Decide you want an abortion.
Step #2: Go to an abortion doctor for a consultation.
Step #3: You and your doctor make an appointment for the procedure.
Step #4: Have the abortion.
Step #5: Go home.

You should really know better than to believe everything you hear on cable opinion shows Scape :lol:


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14940
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:42 pm
 


Those are the lawmakers Dan.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Los Angeles Kings
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2238
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:53 pm
 


Scape wrote:
Those are the lawmakers Dan.

And the BQ lawmakers said for years that Quebec would become its own nation. Did it ever happen?


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.