[DerbyX]

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

CanadianJeff wrote:

RUEZ you just proved his point.

Which point is that? That he lumps all conservatives together?

I do, do I?

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Explain how I used real world forum examples to prove my point and that I was wrong to do so.

Funny how you claim the point "not all cons blame the Libs" yet never once bothered to contradict all the con cries "all Libs are corrupt, etc".


Feel free to answer any of these if you aren't to busy that is.

Nah, your own words speak loud and clear. Keep on truckin.

As do yours. Don't feel bad that you weren't able to debate me on this issue. You'll get better with time. Just keep trying thats all.

[RUEZ]

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

CanadianJeff wrote:

RUEZ you just proved his point.

Which point is that? That he lumps all conservatives together?

I do, do I?

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Explain how I used real world forum examples to prove my point and that I was wrong to do so.

Funny how you claim the point "not all cons blame the Libs" yet never once bothered to contradict all the con cries "all Libs are corrupt, etc".


Feel free to answer any of these if you aren't to busy that is.

Nah, your own words speak loud and clear. Keep on truckin.

As do yours. Don't feel bad that you weren't able to debate me on this issue. You'll get better with time. Just keep trying thats all.

Thanks for the encouragement. Some day I hope to be able to shovel it as well as you.

[Tricks]

DerbyX wrote:

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Do I do that derby? You just did exactly what he said you did.

[RUEZ]

Tricks wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Do I do that derby? You just did exactly what he said you did.

Hey someone get's it. Good deal.

[DerbyX]

Tricks wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Do I do that derby? You just did exactly what he said you did.

Am I like the Libs you yourself have posted about?

I didn't see you contradicting anyone of the cons whenever they posted blanket statements about :the Libs: "being corrupt".

BTW, in this case I gave a very specific reference to a past post of RUEZ blaming the voters for not showing poll support for Harper post election.

Are you actually disputing the fact of massive blaming of the Libs by con supporters?

Have you not engaged in political generalization yourself?

have you not made comments about every Lib based on the actions of just a few?

[DerbyX]

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

CanadianJeff wrote:

RUEZ you just proved his point.

Which point is that? That he lumps all conservatives together?

I do, do I?

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Explain how I used real world forum examples to prove my point and that I was wrong to do so.

Funny how you claim the point "not all cons blame the Libs" yet never once bothered to contradict all the con cries "all Libs are corrupt, etc".


Feel free to answer any of these if you aren't to busy that is.

Nah, your own words speak loud and clear. Keep on truckin.

As do yours. Don't feel bad that you weren't able to debate me on this issue. You'll get better with time. Just keep trying thats all.

Thanks for the encouragement. Some day I hope to be able to shovel it as well as you.

Well you are full of shit so you certainly have the source material at hand.

[Arctic_Menace]

kenmore wrote:

well Harper delaying the work of the nation to keep the tories in power pissed me off royally.. there were alot of bills to be passed and alot of work done by alot of people and now we are supposed to start at zero..
Screw Harper.. bring on the election... !

Yeah. Pulling stunts like this make me feel like Harper is a sneaky rat bastard who only wants to keep a chokehold on power.




P.S. Has anyone noticed that if you replace "LIBRANOS" with "Jews" in most posts of sasquatch2, it looks like something from an Archive of Nazi quotes from the 1930's???

[RUEZ]

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

CanadianJeff wrote:

RUEZ you just proved his point.

Which point is that? That he lumps all conservatives together?

I do, do I?

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Explain how I used real world forum examples to prove my point and that I was wrong to do so.

Funny how you claim the point "not all cons blame the Libs" yet never once bothered to contradict all the con cries "all Libs are corrupt, etc".


Feel free to answer any of these if you aren't to busy that is.

Nah, your own words speak loud and clear. Keep on truckin.

As do yours. Don't feel bad that you weren't able to debate me on this issue. You'll get better with time. Just keep trying thats all.

Thanks for the encouragement. Some day I hope to be able to shovel it as well as you.

Well you are full of shit so you certainly have the source material at hand.

Thanks for taking the high road Derby.

[RUEZ]

Arctic_Menace wrote:

P.S. Has anyone noticed that if you replace "LIBRANOS" with "Jews" in most posts of sasquatch2, it looks like something from an Archive of Nazi quotes from the 1930's???

Only you, ever wonder why that is?

[Tricks]

DerbyX wrote:

Am I like the Libs you yourself have posted about?

Truthfully? Yeah, sometimes you are. Normally is a situation like this.

Quote:

I didn't see you contradicting anyone of the cons whenever they posted blanket statements about :the Libs: "being corrupt".

I've said I don't like it and I don't agree. I can't do much else. I've asked other this question, what do you want me to do?

Quote:

Are you actually disputing the fact of massive blaming of the Libs by con supporters?

By most con supporters? No I'm not. Many liberals on this forum say that Conservative defence is saying Liberals are worse. What's any different about this? Someone makes a sweeping statement, it gets pointed out, and then it turns into my dad can beat up your dad contest. Such a waste of time.

Quote:

Have you not engaged in political generalization yourself?

Probably at some point, but I try to take it back once it's pointed out to me. Normally I do it either out of frustration or being rushed.

Quote:

have you not made comments about every Lib based on the actions of just a few?

Every lib? Maybe. But I don't think I have recently. I've tried to learn on this forum, something not very many here can say sadly.

[Arctic_Menace]

RUEZ wrote:

Arctic_Menace wrote:

P.S. Has anyone noticed that if you replace "LIBRANOS" with "Jews" in most posts of sasquatch2, it looks like something from an Archive of Nazi quotes from the 1930's???

Only you, ever wonder why that is?

'Cause I had a decent history teacher, I'm interested in history, have pretty good memory, and have noticed that periodically there are some members on here(cross-political lines) that speak such neanderthalic garbage, that it echos Nazi propoganda from the 30's???

[DerbyX]

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

CanadianJeff wrote:

RUEZ you just proved his point.

Which point is that? That he lumps all conservatives together?

I do, do I?

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Explain how I used real world forum examples to prove my point and that I was wrong to do so.

Funny how you claim the point "not all cons blame the Libs" yet never once bothered to contradict all the con cries "all Libs are corrupt, etc".


Feel free to answer any of these if you aren't to busy that is.

Nah, your own words speak loud and clear. Keep on truckin.

As do yours. Don't feel bad that you weren't able to debate me on this issue. You'll get better with time. Just keep trying thats all.

Thanks for the encouragement. Some day I hope to be able to shovel it as well as you.

Well you are full of shit so you certainly have the source material at hand.

Thanks for taking the high road Derby.

Call that just desserts for insinuating I was closed-minded (I'm liberal which is by def'n open minded) for telling that newbie the reality of hwanker.

Just remember that I posted very coherent and debatable points and all you responded with were fallacies, one-liners and insults.

Go right back to start.

Rise above what we expect from you. Afterall, you said you wanted a fresh start from whatever it was that got you banned before right?

[RUEZ]

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

DerbyX wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

CanadianJeff wrote:

RUEZ you just proved his point.

Which point is that? That he lumps all conservatives together?

I do, do I?

Explain how any statement I made does that more then all your con cries about the Libs?

Explain how I used real world forum examples to prove my point and that I was wrong to do so.

Funny how you claim the point "not all cons blame the Libs" yet never once bothered to contradict all the con cries "all Libs are corrupt, etc".


Feel free to answer any of these if you aren't to busy that is.

Nah, your own words speak loud and clear. Keep on truckin.

As do yours. Don't feel bad that you weren't able to debate me on this issue. You'll get better with time. Just keep trying thats all.

Thanks for the encouragement. Some day I hope to be able to shovel it as well as you.

Well you are full of shit so you certainly have the source material at hand.

Thanks for taking the high road Derby.

Call that just desserts for insinuating I was closed-minded (I'm liberal which is by def'n open minded) for telling that newbie the reality of hwanker.

Just remember that I posted very coherent and debatable points and all you responded with were fallacies, one-liners and insults.

Go right back to start.

Rise above what we expect from you. Afterall, you said you wanted a fresh start from whatever it was that got you banned before right?

Sorry dude, I wasn't banned. Nice try though. You are as bad an any of the people you degrade.

[Tricks]

DerbyX wrote:

I'm liberal which is by def'n open minded

Anyone else take that as almost elitist? Well I'm conservative, so I guess I'm close minded and evil. Crap.

[Arctic_Menace]

Quote:

Sorry dude, I wasn't banned. Nice try though. You are as bad an any of the people you degrade.

I remember you telling me once to "get off my high horse"...

I think it's time to follow your own advice.


C'mon, EVERYONE on here bitches and had degraded someone at least once. This is especially true when it comes to politics. Instead of trying to effectively debate, people jsut end up bashing each other or their beliefs. This transcends political lines by the way...

So much of this "morally and intelligently superior" bullshit that pours out from people on here in giant waves has got to stop...

Derby, this applies to you as well.