Prestwick
Active Member
Posts: 422
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:21 pm
Sorry but you just can't compare Ataturk to a totally scheming, power mad murderering nutter like Mao. You simply can't. The man brought Turkey out of the dark ages, he modernised education in Turkey, ushered in a westernised alphabet, and by making the nation secular via the constitution ensured freedom of expression regardless of whether you are a Muslim, a Christian or a Jew. His decrees on liberalising what women could wear, where they could work, getting the vote sent shockwaves through a traditionally (and still) heavily conservative Islamic world.
When it came to alcohol, Ataturk basically said "where in the Koran does it say clearly "thou shalt not drink!"...exactly, it doesn't" and authorised production of alcohol in Turkey for the first time in almost 600 years. The man did something which nobody has been able to do in the Islamic world since: bring the religion out of the middle ages.
It is very difficult to avoid Ataturk in Turkey because, lets face it, he was the guy who built modern day Turkey. He is what made it what it is today.
And as for Gul, he'll pay lip service to secularism if he knows what is good for him. In any case he cannot do much damage as President and he was quite a good foreign minister so he isn't all bad.