Psudo wrote:
Brenda wrote:
Bachmann's argument is one that the anti-vaccination crowd uses for EVERY vaccination.
I think there's an extra wrinkle in vaccinating pre-teens for a sexually transmitted disease. Abstinence or safe sex practices can prevent HPV just as well with no chance of side effects. It seems like a valid pro-choice/reproductive rights issue to me, though the choice should usually be for vaccination.
Exactly. So her agenda was not the child that got "retarded", but the "no sex before marriage"-lecture.
I didn't explain explicitly what all the shots they got were for, and they don't care. They know (already) that sex is done with a condom, or not.
I am pretty sure they do not see the HPV shot (at 11, come on) as a free-be to have unprotected sex because "now nothing can happen, I'm vaccinated".
I was 25 when I was diagnosed, 7 weeks pregnant, and about to get married (OHHH!!!! I WAS PREGNANT BEFORE I GOT MARRIED!! Yep, actually, for the second time, first one was a miscarriage) and that diagnose could have been prevented if I had gotten the shot (if it would have existed back then

).
Most carriers of the HPV virus do not know they have it.
I am doing every thing I can to prevent my kids from getting sick, I vaccinate them against pox, rhubella etc, why not this? They don't live in a bubble.